++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++
More to Erik, personally I didn't see Zlatan's posting as claiming superiority at all over others who have made mistakes. I took it more that he didn't he didn't see the need to define himself by his transgressions.
As for Josh's post, everywhere I've been I've encountered at least some subset of people who wear -- at least initially -- their alcohol or drug use as an attempt to define their individuality through the perception of rebelliousness.
It's partly the adolescent trap: you grow up under the wings of parents or guardians for all your life to that point, and socially you need to define yourself as separate from that as part of the ritual of growing up. And suddenly, what your peers think of you becomes very, very important. In fact, more important at that stage than it will be for probably the rest of your entire life.
And the way the adolescent trap works? You're a mama's boy if you get good grades, you don't skip class, you don't smoke, you don't drink, you don't do drugs. Socially, in a lot of circles, there is practically a stigmatism associated with that at an age where everyone's trying to define themselves as individuals separate from their parents ... and the rest of society for that matter. So rebelling against the conventions has an enormous attraction for some.
But people do get into the darker paths of life for different reasons. Some because of a lack of self-esteem. Some to cope. Some experiment and they lose their way. Some a combination. But for all the grief that follows those who make mistakes (and rightfully may have earned the right to be rid of that, because we all make mistakes), it's also true that the others that don't make those mistakes often get only a fraction of the credit or social status for having the strength to avoid certain mistakes to begin with. If you're not tortured, it's not news and you're considered boring.
More to Erik, personally I didn't see Zlatan's posting as claiming superiority at all over others who have made mistakes. I took it more that he didn't he didn't see the need to define himself by his transgressions.
As for Josh's post, everywhere I've been I've encountered at least some subset of people who wear -- at least initially -- their alcohol or drug use as an attempt to define their individuality through the perception of rebelliousness.
It's partly the adolescent trap: you grow up under the wings of parents or guardians for all your life to that point, and socially you need to define yourself as separate from that as part of the ritual of growing up. And suddenly, what your peers think of you becomes very, very important. In fact, more important at that stage than it will be for probably the rest of your entire life.
And the way the adolescent trap works? You're a mama's boy if you get good grades, you don't skip class, you don't smoke, you don't drink, you don't do drugs. Socially, in a lot of circles, there is practically a stigmatism associated with that at an age where everyone's trying to define themselves as individuals separate from their parents ... and the rest of society for that matter. So rebelling against the conventions has an enormous attraction for some.
But people do get into the darker paths of life for different reasons. Some because of a lack of self-esteem. Some to cope. Some experiment and they lose their way. Some a combination. But for all the grief that follows those who make mistakes (and rightfully may have earned the right to be rid of that, because we all make mistakes), it's also true that the others that don't make those mistakes often get only a fraction of the credit or social status for having the strength to avoid certain mistakes to begin with. If you're not tortured, it's not news and you're considered boring.
Exactly Greg, fantastic post.
