it's like saying we sold vidal for 37 therefore dybala only cost us 5 mil
nonsense...It is nothing of the sort. vidal and dybala are separate deals for separate players. There is no comparison whatsoever.
The actual financial cost of Zaza seems to be 11.5m. Or you can look at it in a different, rather convoluted and illogical way of...Sassuolo agreed to pay us 7.5m for Zaza in 2014 over 3-4 years, and we now agreed to pay Sassuolo 18m over 3-4 years. We will not be paying them, whilst they are paying us, for the same player. That makes no sense, other than from an accounting view. Which is of less interest to me. What is of interest is that Zaza presently, looks like costing us 11.5m.
However, take into account that Sassuolo are now paying us over 4 years 10m for Berardi, when we sign him next year, we will already have received maybe 2.5m (?) so if we pick him up for 18m we are really only playing 15.5m...
Of course there will be a fair portion who don't see the details of these deals and only focus on the numbers in the headlines. And it might be fair to say that Zaza has a value of 18m. But that is not the same as to say we are paying 18m for him in cash.\
Also seems logical to assume that for us to wait until the 15m option had passed, and to 'pay' the extra 3m, was in exchange for something...probably/certainly related to the Berardi deal. Perhaps an option to take him in January for 18m if one of our other forwards is crunched, including an agreement for us to send them Coman or something along those loans, as compensation, as a loan for the remainder of the season...that would seem fair.
Still, Beppe and Paratici are too wily to be dillydallying, and suddenly realize 'damn!' the price has gone up by 3m! nevermind eh! We got something for that 3m. Which we will never end up paying in cash...