Simone Pepe (36 Viewers)

[TrezJuve]

People other than Juventino[RUS] defending Pepe

It really is incredible.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[X Æ A-12]

Giaccherini is miles ahead of Pepe.

Also, to those who think otherwise, Pepe wasn't the one who passed the ball to Vucinic: it was in fact Giaccherini.

Well he is yet to show it.

He already has.

Pepe failed pretty much everything he attempted unlike Giaccherini. He also was really wasteful in possession.

The only thing I said, at first, is that Giaccherini is better than Pepe. I didn't said he had the better games. Read more carefully.

LOL ok whatever you say

 

[TrezJuve]

LOL ok whatever you say

Yes, Giaccherini always had the better skills ouf of the two, so in theory he already proved it. Your point?

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Not really hard to see who has the better skills. Had Pepe not scored you would be singing another tune.

Quaresma is more skilled than Nedved. Your point?

Had Trezeguet not scored all those goals, he wouldn't be rated as one of the best strikers ever... But he did.

 

[X Æ A-12]

Yes, Giaccherini always had the better skills ouf of the two, so in theory he already proved it. Your point?

He already proved what? Mauro Zarate has incredible technical ability but he's still a shit footballer.

My point was that Giacc sucked in the first two games and Pepe was better, nothing more. I'm not defending or overrating Pepe I'm stating facts

 

[TrezJuve]

Quaresma is more skilled than Nedved. Your point?

Had Trezeguet not scored all those goals, he wouldn't be rated as one of the best strikers ever... But he did.

Yes, but the point is, Pepe is a midfielder and he isn't supposed to score goals, he needs to provoke things. he probably won't score regularly either. His two games were really awful bar the goal. Also, his purpose is to contribute to our game and he doesn't.

Also, Quaresma sure isn't the best player out of the two, because obviously Nedved contributed more as a player. Pepe contributes next to nothing to our play, and don't be surprise if he doesn't score in the future.

Also, what will you say if Giaccherini outscore him?

 

[TrezJuve]

He already proved what? Mauro Zarate has incredible technical ability but he's still a shit footballer.

My point was that Giacc sucked in the first two games and Pepe was better, nothing more. I'm not defending or overrating Pepe I'm stating facts

Zarate's decision making is really poor, like Pepe's... and both suck.

Edit: Pepe indeed is the more effective out of the two at the moment. He still isn't the better player.

I don't understand what is there to debate, really.

 

[TrezJuve]

Zarate's decision making is really poor, like Pepe's... and both suck.

Sorry for the amount of successive post but I just wanted to add:

Decision making is an important factor in regards to what makes a good footballer, so you can't disregard it when you compare two players.

 

[X Æ A-12]

Zarate's decision making is really poor, like Pepe's... and both suck.

Edit: Pepe indeed is the more effective out of the two at the moment. He still isn't the better player.

I don't understand what is there to debate, really.

Yea honestly I have no idea where you are going with this.

 

[frick]

Yes, but the point is, Pepe is a midfielder and he isn't supposed to score goals, he needs to provoke things. he probably won't score regularly either. His two games were really awful bar the goal. Also, his purpose is to contribute to our game and he doesn't.

Also, Quaresma sure isn't the best player out of the two, because obviously Nedved contributed more as a player. Pepe contributes next to nothing to our play, and don't be surprise if he doesn't score in the future.

He was heavily involved in at least a goal for two games now, one proved to be decisive.

With that butterflies and golf swings, how much more provoking do you want?

 

[TrezJuve]

Yea honestly I have no idea where you are going with this.

I admit the way I answered your posts was pretty erratic, but seriously I also don't understand either what you're trying to point out. I got some slack because I said Giaccherini was the better player and then you went on saying he played worst in those two games and that he was showing otherwise. Even if it were true, how the hell is it an indicator of him being the better player?

If Lichtsteiner wouldn't have scored at all and if Motta did, would have that mean he is the better player? I extrapolated a little bit, and I know it's a bit different when it comes to defenders in regards to their roles because we expect different things from them, but my point still stands. Giaccherini is the more skilled, be it mentally (example: decision making wise, because yes I consider it a skill) or on the ball and he contribute more overall in a game (even while doing nothing) as he isn't fucking up.

 

[TrezJuve]

He was heavily involved in at least a goal for two games now, one proved to be decisive.

With that butterflies and golf swings, how much more provoking do you want?

Personnally, I see it as a fluke as he fucked up a whole lot more compared to what he brought in a good way.

 

[Cheesio]

Pepe is not a football player.

 

[TrezJuve]

I would have +reped you if I didn't need to spread before

 

[Cheesio]

I would have +reped you if I didn't need to spread before

 

[X Æ A-12]

I admit the way I answered your posts was pretty erratic, but seriously I also don't understand either what you're trying to point out. I got some slack because I said Giaccherini was the better player and then you went on saying he played worst in those two games and that he was showing otherwise. Even if it were true, how the hell is it an indicator of him being the better player?

If Lichtsteiner wouldn't have scored at all and if Motta did, would have that mean he is the better player? I extrapolated a little bit, and I know it's a bit different when it comes to defenders in regards to their roles because we expect different things from them, but my point still stands. Giaccherini is the more skilled, be it mentally (example: decision making wise, because yes I consider it a skill) or on the ball and he contribute more overall in a game (even while doing nothing) as he isn't fucking up.

You said Giacc was by far the better player than Pepe. I said he has yet to show it and you disagreed. Understand?

 

[TrezJuve]

You said Giacc was by far the better player than Pepe. I said he has yet to show it and you disagreed. Understand?

Are you an idiot or what? Your statement can be interpreted in different ways: I thought you were saying he never proved to be better as in overall, did not think you meant on the pitch. Be more precise next time, please.

 

[X Æ A-12]

lol how? He's been terrible in his first two matches, at least Pepe was sprinting up and down his flank, making tackles and pressuring the opposition.

Giacc hasn't done dick.

Are you an idiot or what? Your statement can be interpreted in different ways: I thought you were saying he never proved to be better as in overall, did not think you meant on the pitch. Be more precise next time, please.

That post not clear enough for you? ^

 

[TrezJuve]

No, it wasn't at first. I thought you were trying to make a case that he was a better player because he 'offered' something that day. Apologies, then.

 

[X Æ A-12]

apology accepted.