salihamdzic is not even considered a first team player.
for someone who is considered the heir to nedved (in this forum) or as a must-starter in front of nedved, he should do more, don't you think so ? creating two chances the whole game does not satisfy that you may play 90 minutes.
statistics show, that even the best teams do take at least 3 goal chances to score a goal.
here a little link on that based on the current german league
http://www.wahretabelle.de/wahretabelle/chancentod.php
it does really depend on the team, but that does not mean that a good team has to score every third chance ... good teams partially do compensate this ratio with creating more chances.
i can take the positives out of the game, that giovinco again got his hour of football and i hope it does go on like this. perhaps at the end of the season we will have done a slow transition to giovinco as starter on nedveds position.
for someone who is considered the heir to nedved (in this forum) or as a must-starter in front of nedved, he should do more, don't you think so ? creating two chances the whole game does not satisfy that you may play 90 minutes.
statistics show, that even the best teams do take at least 3 goal chances to score a goal.
here a little link on that based on the current german league
http://www.wahretabelle.de/wahretabelle/chancentod.php
it does really depend on the team, but that does not mean that a good team has to score every third chance ... good teams partially do compensate this ratio with creating more chances.
i can take the positives out of the game, that giovinco again got his hour of football and i hope it does go on like this. perhaps at the end of the season we will have done a slow transition to giovinco as starter on nedveds position.
Let me rephrase the question: what was Salihamidzic doing out there that warranted him staying on while Giovinco had to sit down on the bench?
