[SERIE A] Lecce vs JUVENTUS (12/07/08) (4 Viewers)

Marceℓℓo

Senior Member
Mar 16, 2007
7,242
I don't understand the Marchionni insults.

You guys treat him as he is an Interista and murdered your family.I guess we all can agree that he had a weak game but why all the hate?I- and I'm probably the only one- think that he's a great alternative if someone's injured.It's not like Joaquin would accept the bench or anything.Instead of the pointless hatred towards Marco be happy that he's injury-free.I'd prefer to keep him over getting Schweinsteiger any day of the week and two times on friday.Take that haters.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Dukoski

Moggi's Admirer and Fan
May 1, 2006
392
We played bad,bad today.Okay we were without many players but anyway we played bad.
Other than Giovinco goal and Amauri,we played like some serie B team.We will have a lot of problems against Milan if we play like today.Marchisio is an idiot,but who can put Ranieri instead?
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,000
come on, how many times was lecce free in front of the net. it worked only because their main striker was more preoccupied with throwing elbows and saying sorry than scoring
I second this.

The goal itself may have been just one episode and it may have been taken perfectly but during those 10 minutes before they scored, they were allowed all the space in the world to do whatever they want in our box.
The goal was just the finale.
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
Marceℓℓo;1828666 said:
I don't understand the Marchionni insults.

You guys treat him as he is an Interista and murdered your family.I guess we all can agree that he had a weak game but why all the hate?I- and I'm probably the only one- think that he's a great alternative if someone's injured.It's not like Joaquin would accept the bench or anything.Instead of the pointless hatred towards Marco be happy that he's injury-free.I'd prefer to keep him over getting Schweinsteiger any day of the week and two times on friday.Take that haters.
:rofl2: nice one!
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
i wonder where you got that from ?
i never heard that you may not use the offside trap once you lead !
if you did play football, than you would no that strict man marking without use of the offside trap is way more exhausting than remaining with the offside trap.

i really do not see the logic behind this . . .
What part in my post you didn't understand? I got it from Baywatch.

It makes much more sense/logic not to play the offside trap once you lead. The opposition are always faster and in-control once they're loosing/down. Having a quick feet striker will take most of the defenders easily if he's loosing, therefore any mistake in the offside trap could be costly.

Playing normal system zone defending like what Lecce did in their first half, putting 7men in their penalty area makes the opposition suffers more.... and find no space, specially when you have good players on air such as Chiellieni/Legro/Sissoko/Marchisio etc.


Anything else?
 

rounder

Blindman
Jun 13, 2007
7,233
isn't it possible that Lecce scored a fantastic goal? it can't always be the DF's fault
The guy was wide open, he was practically left alone against a helpless Manninger. We would have easilly avoided that goal had it not been for the players playing for the offside trap.

When you play against smaller teams and are leading 1-0 what is the perfect scenario you are looking for? A counter attack, right? You want an opportinity to see all the Lecce players attack and just wait for the perfect break through where you have players like Gio and Amauri that would destroy the Lecce defense when given enough space. For that to happen you have to forget about the offside trap.

Now when you do play the offside trap and you aren't a particularly talenmted team at holding up the ball all you're doing is giving the other team more and more chances to hit you with a through ball. I think it's a very risky tactic for us to play. We lost hwen played that tactic against Inter, but we won both games when we played without it against Real.
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
Marcello, if your post is directed at me I didn't insult Marchionni mate. He deserves all the bashing though.

I believe they can fit together. With one of them sacrificing and playing a bit out of his position.



I hope you're not serious. How will that affect our chances of scoring? Del Piero with both Giovinco and Mauro playing in the middle can create absolute creativity against any team.

And thats our best medicine against long crossing balls.



This post makes no sense I'm afraid. I don't really care if Marchionni is a sub or not, it's not like he played his first match. He's been awful, doesn't pass when he should, can't shoot when he should can't control the ball. Nothing.

Nedved adds 10x much more than Marchionni. At least he knows how to handle such a situation when someone is marking him and knows how to earn fouls and even RUNS much more than a 10years younger Marchionni. Please!!!!

Fuck, it took De Ceglie one fucking good cross.

Get him out of the team or keep him on the bench, start De Ceglie when Mauro isn't there or hell even Iaquinta can play there. I've had enough of Marchionni.



wont happen... This will also means that Inter should face it this year.
 

Marceℓℓo

Senior Member
Mar 16, 2007
7,242
Nah,that wasn't directed at you,Rabinho.That was directed at the ones insulting him with "sob" and told him to fuck off etc.You just criticized him which he deserved,unlike the insults.

I can't stand reading that kind of posts.He's a Juventino after all and he came back after a really long period of injuries.Give him time.
 

v1rtu4l

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2008
6,349
i don't think the offside trap is something you switch on or off... it is a defensive tactic which is learned in training and does not only influence the behaviour of the 4 defenders, but the other players too. i dare to say that it is more risky to switch to something you are not used too (dumb man marking) in the middle of the game ... and how is it more dangerous to concede a goal after you lead ? The danger is always there ... leading or not ... if the offside trap is good enough for the first 80 minutes of the game, it has to be good enough for the rest of it too ...
following that logic you could also say "ok, this striker always beats our defenders when they try to man mark him ... lets switch to the offside trap and cancel him out in this way"...
 

rounder

Blindman
Jun 13, 2007
7,233
I second this.

The goal itself may have been just one episode and it may have been taken perfectly but during those 10 minutes before they scored, they were allowed all the space in the world to do whatever they want in our box.
The goal was just the finale.
That header Castillo missed was a result of very bad marking from Marchioni's part, not the tactic Juve was playing in. In other words, they shouldn't have gotten that chance if the players were doing their job well. However, the second we start playing the offside trap they fuck us over with the equilizer.

do you remember our game vs Real when we were up by a goal and were pinned down. They couldn't do jack shit. That''s because the players were extremely focused. The Lecce chance was a result of a lapse in concentration.

Come on, if you were down 1-0, would you rather play in an area where 10 men are defending against you leaving you absolutely no room to create anything, or would you rather play against a team emplying the offside tactic that could easilly be broken with a well-timed run?
 
Jul 9, 2008
207
Great victory ,

giovinco & marchisio were the best !!

grygera (( the gay )) & the funny penguin (( marchionni )) were like a fuckin' tumor in my brain , my blood pressure always reaches the peak point when i see them playing , :mad:

look at lazio's right backs , lestechtainer & de selvistry !! .. both of them are better than grygera !!

zanetti , good 2 see u in the bench , we miss u , ;)
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,000
Inter 1 - 0 Lecce
Cruz 80 minute

Lecce-Milan 1:1
Ronaldinho 79 (M), Esposito 94 (L)

As you can see, the other two big teams (especially Inter, iirc) also struggled against Beretta's tactics. Actually, apart from Roma, all the others found out that Lecce are a tough nut. They play tough defense, they play dirty and foul a lot, and even if they concede they don't lose it and they push for the equaliser.

We did play bad, but it also had a lot to do with the way Beretta set the tactics.
 
Jan 7, 2004
29,704
That header Castillo missed was a result of very bad marking from Marchioni's part, not the tactic Juve was playing in. In other words, they shouldn't have gotten that chance if the players were doing their job well. However, the second we start playing the offside trap they fuck us over with the equilizer.

do you remember our game vs Real when we were up by a goal and were pinned down. They couldn't do jack shit. That''s because the players were extremely focused. The Lecce chance was a result of a lapse in concentration.

Come on, if you were down 1-0, would you rather play in an area where 10 men are defending against you leaving you absolutely no room to create anything, or would you rather play against a team emplying the offside tactic that could easilly be broken with a well-timed run?

we are all arguing the same point here ... juve's defense hath seen better days
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
i don't think the offside trap is something you switch on or off... it is a defensive tactic which is learned in training and does not only influence the behaviour of the 4 defenders, but the other players too. i dare to say that it is more risky to switch to something you are not used too (dumb man marking) in the middle of the game ... and how is it more dangerous to concede a goal after you lead ? The danger is always there ... leading or not ... if the offside trap is good enough for the first 80 minutes of the game, it has to be good enough for the rest of it too ...
following that logic you could also say "ok, this striker always beats our defenders when they try to man mark him ... lets switch to the offside trap and cancel him out in this way"...
yea :agree: the back line has been trained to push up in all situations, and that is even more evident with our very high offside trap...it works 90% of the time, so fair enough
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,000
That header Castillo missed was a result of very bad marking from Marchioni's part, not the tactic Juve was playing in. In other words, they shouldn't have gotten that chance if the players were doing their job well. However, the second we start playing the offside trap they fuck us over with the equilizer.

do you remember our game vs Real when we were up by a goal and were pinned down. They couldn't do jack shit. That''s because the players were extremely focused. The Lecce chance was a result of a lapse in concentration.

Come on, if you were down 1-0, would you rather play in an area where 10 men are defending against you leaving you absolutely no room to create anything, or would you rather play against a team emplying the offside tactic that could easilly be broken with a well-timed run?
Why do i feel you chose a wrong post to reply to?

I was also saying that we chose the wrong aproach and we allowed Lecce to be dangerous. We could've easily avoided it.
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
Now when you do play the offside trap and you aren't a particularly talenmted team at holding up the ball all you're doing is giving the other team more and more chances to hit you with a through ball. I think it's a very risky tactic for us to play. We lost hwen played that tactic against Inter, but we won both games when we played without it against Real.
FINALLY!!!!!!!
 

La_Fidanzata

Senior Member
Feb 18, 2008
653
These players and coaches are here to do a job and they get paid for it extremely well.

If you stop performing at your job, than you get fired or substituted.
Marchioni is a sub. And in most of the cases he can be useful, (when Camo is injured) Why everyone is on his case..We dont have money to buy better RM sub.

Btw I saw game Arsenal vs Wigan last night where Arsenal won 1:0. Coach which i respect a lot, Wenger in 32min replaced Nasri with Eboue..Eboue played OK, but towards the end of game , he made 2-3 bad passes, just like Molinaro do every game.. And in 90th minute, as supporters were booing, he replaced Eboue with defender Silvestre??? He could take any midfielder out in last 90th minute, but he took guy who he introduced in 32nd min..

What that move can do to the confidence of a player? That was shit move by Wenger..

Imagine now, CR start replacing Molinaro, Marchioni, Nedved, Legro, and all other every time they make some silly mistakes..

CR noticed Marchioni's bad day, but he let him play bit more, and than changed him.. Marchioni was good for us when we won 6-7 games in row wasn't he !?

Common guys, little respect to all players..Im sure he will be watching lots of videos tomorrow..

Forza Juve ..3 points is what we count tonight

Well said boss!
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,751
I'm with rab on this one, it's only natural people are going to be hating on him, especially when for some unkown reason he keeps the likes of Giovinco out, if it wasn't for iaquintas injury we might have never scored. Giovinco was pulling most of the weight on the RM. Marchionni has some of the worst passing which is awful for a RM and twice today he misplaced an easy pass which allowed lecce to flood forward on the counter. He also did this vs Palermo,( I think it was them)
For me he deserves his critisism as a starter, if he was a sub and played every now and again. As I said I've had enough marchionni for a month now.
Marchionni=molinaro of this season*
*so far, and he hasn't been as bad as moli was last season, but he has been our worst player.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)