[Serie A] Juventus - Sampdoria (September 12, 2010) (26 Viewers)

[Red]

Melo was probably our best player in the second half, he could have cost Juve a goal but he also could have scored the game winner in the end. Marchisio was invisible for a big part of the game.

Invisible?

Marchisio was the one holding position in the midfield and keeping the shape of the team when Melo was running around like a headless chicken.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Alen]

I guess the goals they scored were included in the ratings they got and made their ratings higher by at least 0,5. (Talking about Pepe, Marchisio and Quag).
That leaves only Del Piero's rating as "undeserved" because if Quag's original rating was 5.5, as well as Marchisio's, then DP should get 5.5 too, because he played just as good/bad as those two and unlike them he didn't do anything remarkable.

 

[Enron]

That's just not true.

 

[awit]

Quag wasn't bad, he was quite involved a few times and also should have scored 2 goals but Pepe stole his 2nd one (or 1st however you put it).

 

[king Ale]

Invisible?

Marchisio was the one holding position in the midfield and keeping the shape of the team when Melo was running around like a headless chicken.

Perhaps I watched another game

I guess the goals they scored were included in the ratings they got and made their ratings higher by at least 0,5. (Talking about Pepe, Marchisio and Quag).
That leaves only Del Piero's rating as "undeserved" because if Quag's original rating was 5.5, as well as Marchisio's, then DP should get 5.5 too, because he played just as good/bad as those two and unlike them he didn't do anything remarkable.

I only think Melo deserves a 6.5 only because I think between him and Marchisio, he was the better of the two.

 

[Dominic]

I'm with Red.

 

[Enron]

I'm with Red.

Definitely.

 

[Azzurri7]

I'm with Dominic.

 

[Enron]

 

[Bozi]

i am with red and dom,but then i was getting shot down yesterday for saying that Melo could have cost us 2 goals and we actually could ahve been 3 down

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

before marchisio scored the goal, the team was sleeping. now if we are a better team with a sissoko - melo partnership down there, that remains to be seen

 

[Azzurri7]

I'm on Boz, I mean with Boz

 

[Hust]

I'm by myself, but agree with Red and wishing I was on Rab.

 

[Bozi]

I'm on Boz, I mean with Boz

i wish you were right first time

 

[GordoDeCentral]

oh please marchisio was barely holding his shorts up, lets stop making excuses for him he was invisible defensively and never tried to do anything offensively always going for lateral passes

 

[Nenz]

Invisible?

Marchisio was the one holding position in the midfield and keeping the shape of the team when Melo was running around like a headless chicken.

Lets not forget Melo is a destroyer and his role was to dispossess the opponent. His running around like a headless chicken won us the ball many times and protected the defence. He still made a decent offensive contribution as well. While Marchisio may have stayed in position, he didn't move to recieve the ball, when he recieved the ball he did nothing with it and he didn't apply all that much pressure (at least not to Melo's effect).

What Melo was doing was trying, Marchisio was just lazy and didn't contribute anything except for his goal which came from a blind assist into the area from Krasic. I would rather our players actually worked hard and made one or two msitakes then not work at all and have a blemish free but ineffective game.

 

[king Ale]

I really like Marchisio but he seemed a bit indifferent at some points in the game.

 

[Hust]

I really like Marchisio but he seemed a bit indifferent at some points in the game.

You could say the same about Melo.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

You could say the same about Melo.

i love it when you actually endorse an idea, it just reinforces my belief in its opposition

 

[Alen]

i love it when you actually endorse an idea, it just reinforces my belief in its opposition

Leave him alone