If Ranieri didn't take Poulsen off for Camoranesi and if the match ended 1:1, you'd have blamed him for not having balls to go for the win.
Now that he did replace Poulsen and when he did go for the win, you blame him for the defeat.
Yes, it's obvious that our lack of passion and our pathetic displays are mostly Ranieri's fault. He MUST go.
But you guys make everything a lose-lose situation.
Yes, who knows..
might be there will be a lot who blamed Ranieri when he not take Poulsen and get a draw..
But i see Ranieri is not have character, wise, and tactic
I think played with 10 players and a lot of first team injured also the way we played is so worse
will made Ranieri defend the draw result (1-1)
but he want to win and bring more attacking option
but in other case when we can win against Catania or Samp
and there is a sign we need tactical chance or players change
he don't use it or choose and defensive option
So the question is the reason behind Ranieri decision..
his decision is shocking