[Serie A] JUVENTUS 4-0 Lecce (Oct. 17th 2010) (5 Viewers)

[Azzurri7]

Yeah, but it's 4-4-2 and not 4-3-3. End of story

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Dominic]

bad comparisation, the entire palermo side was based around making shure krasic didnt got a good ball, and if he did, that he was in such position he could do little with it.


if the entire team wasent such fail that day, and provided krasic with balls he could actually use, then it would be another thing.


also, that was krasic 3th match for us or something,next time we face palermo, balzaretti will cry

Nah. Palermo are one of the most open and attacking sides in Serie A. There was space for Krasic, palermo's game was not based on stopping him.


Seriously guys? I rate Krasic a lot, but whats the problem with saying that one player was able to stop him.

 

[Nenz]

I can recall Ranieri putting on Sissoko around the 88th minute against Palermo when we were leading 2 nil and he injured himself and missed the Chelsea games a few days later and was out for a 2 months with a broken bone in his foot so I can see where Buck is coming from.

I would of also like to of seen him give Martinez a run out.

Oh, then I guess we should NEVER play Del Piero. The more time he plays the more likely he is to injure.

 

[Hængebøffer]

Watching this team celebrate each goal against a weaker opponent is embarrassing and laughable.

They need to celebrate once they climb the table instead of scoring a few goals. Especially jokers like Amauri and Grygera who add no value to the team and its performance

This post is laughable.

 

[Ahmed]

Dru, apologise.

 

[Salvo]

Jesus, why do people get so bent out of shape over formation? It's 4-4-2, but it's not something that is set in stone. Krasic is obviously given a lot of freedom and at times it can look like we're playing 4-3-3. But it doesn't matter, because that's what having quality players is all about, mixing it up on the pitch.

 

[BIG DADDY!!!]

Oh, then I guess we should NEVER play Del Piero. The more time he plays the more likely he is to injure.

 

[Nenz]

Its not my logic which is wrong.

 

[BIG DADDY!!!]

I never says you were wrong, I was just posting an example of loosing a star play to a long term injury unnecessarily when the the points are already in the bag.

You would of cursed Del Neri if Ale got injured after coming on aswell and the point me and Buck was making was that Martinezs needed the minutes more.

Same logic would apply to all are star players from Ale to Krasic.

 

[Nenz]

I never says you were wrong, I was just posting an example of loosing a star play to a long term injury unnecessarily when the the points are already in the bag.

You would of cursed Del Neri if Ale got injured after coming on aswell and the point me and Buck was making was that Martinezs needed the minutes more.

Same logic would apply to all are star players from Ale to Krasic.

I would, now? Maybe if he was over playing Ale and forcing him into injury but if someone gets injured coming on at 80 minutes that's just bad luck.


So save the face palm.

 

[.zero]

This post is laughable.

Don't cramp up, chief

 

[.zero]

Dru, apologise.

I'm sorry this team sucks and celebrates like a bunch of bitches when they roll a lesser team and has no "self-beleif" or whatever the fuck that is

 

[Ahmed]

that's quite alright.

 

[Alen]

Why are people calling it a 4-3-3? It's still 4-4-2.

We were talking about a formation with 1 striker. In that case it's a 4-5-1 or a 4-3-3, but not a 4-4-2.

Or maybe you're referring to some previous posts that I missed. In that case, if they talked about the formations we used so far, it was a 4-4-2.

 

[.zero]

that's quite alright.

Thanks for taking it easy on me

 

[BIG DADDY!!!]

I would, now? Maybe if he was over playing Ale and forcing him into injury but if someone gets injured coming on at 80 minutes that's just bad luck.
So save the face palm.

Exactly! It would of been bad luck which could of been avoided if Ale hadn't of been subbed in as the points were in the bag and there was no need for his presence. (ie my point about the Sissoko sub )

If he did pick up a serious injury would you stand hand on your heart and say that its fine cause Ale was really needed out there?

And about resting Ale every game? I think Ale should play a part in every game where he is needed.

 

[awit]

I would, now? Maybe if he was over playing Ale and forcing him into injury but if someone gets injured coming on at 80 minutes that's just bad luck.


So save the face palm.

Someone gives you a revolver with 1/6 bullets in the chamber and tells you to point at yourself and pull the trigger. You end up shooting yourself, were you

a) stupid
b) unlucky


There was no reason to risk Ale in this match but Del Neri has done it before. For some reason he isn't willing to bench him for 90 minutes (hasn't done it once this season).

 

[Red]

Jesus, why do people get so bent out of shape over formation? It's 4-4-2, but it's not something that is set in stone. Krasic is obviously given a lot of freedom and at times it can look like we're playing 4-3-3. But it doesn't matter, because that's what having quality players is all about, mixing it up on the pitch.

Nah. Palermo are one of the most open and attacking sides in Serie A. There was space for Krasic, palermo's game was not based on stopping him.


Seriously guys? I rate Krasic a lot, but whats the problem with saying that one player was able to stop him.

Palermo had a narrow midfield, so were able to completely dominate that area of the pitch.

That meant that, though Krasic was in space, none of Juve's other midfielders were able to get on the ball enough to supply him.

 

[Stu]

We were talking about a formation with 1 striker. In that case it's a 4-5-1 or a 4-3-3, but not a 4-4-2.

Or maybe you're referring to some previous posts that I missed. In that case, if they talked about the formations we used so far, it was a 4-4-2.

I thought you guys were talking about the formation we played in this game. My bad.