[Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012) (10 Viewers)

[IrishZebra]

We've hardly got superstars leading the line now have we lads? It's not the fault of 4-3-3 if the front of the 3 isn't doing the business...

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[AndreaCristiano]

We've hardly got superstars leading the line now have we lads? It's not the fault of 4-3-3 if the front of the 3 isn't doing the business...

exactly my friend! nice seeing you back

 

[Fint]

Nice to see you back IZ, I was starting to feel like the only paddy at the party

 

[Hust]

We've hardly got superstars leading the line now have we lads? It's not the fault of 4-3-3 if the front of the 3 isn't doing the business...

That's the problem. The 433 is perfect for us. Our offense just needs to stop being so damn wasteful.

 

[Fake Melo]

Hustini, report please. Positive draws? Elaborate

 

[Hust]

When did this myth of "positive draws" start? I can only remember one match, against Udinese were (maybe I? maybe others) said that this neccesarily wasn't a bad result.

It started as soon as people started saying that draws against tough teams were "positive".

It was then reinforced by people after every game that said "we are still undefeated"....as in "look at the bright side"

 

[IrishZebra]

So then the issue isn't what formation, but rather, who has the finishing and pace to lead Conte's 4-3-3?

 

[Oggy]

Now watch Conte subbing both strikers around 70th minute...

 

[Fake Melo]

It started as soon as people started saying that draws against tough teams were "positive".

It was then reinforced by people after every game that said "we are still undefeated"....as in "look at the bright side"

I see. Thanks.

Anyhow, we better score two or three goals against these fuckers. Their counter-attacks are brutal.

 

[Hust]

Hustini, report please. Positive draws? Elaborate

Just did.

More or less, the draws were looked based off who we drew...make sense? The draws to Udinese & Napoli "were positive" because they were tougher opponents.

Then people started making excuses that we were "playing away", etc...

I will take an egg please...sunny side up.

---------- Post added 18.02.2012 at 13:03 ----------

I see. Thanks.

Anyhow, we better score two or three goals against these fuckers. Their counter-attacks are brutal.

I'm not all that worried about counter attacks that much anymore, considering our stellar defensive record.

It's our attack we need to worry about, Melo.

 

[IliveForJuve]

I thought Hust was the optimist. Guess I was wrong!

 

[AndreaCristiano]

So then the issue isn't what formation, but rather, who has the finishing and pace to lead Conte's 4-3-3?

once again echoing what I have been saying the forwards are the issue not the formation, a shit load of wasted chances by all

 

[Hust]

once again echoing what I have been saying the forwards are the issue not the formation, a shit load of wasted chances by all

You are not alone in this endeavor.

---------- Post added 18.02.2012 at 13:06 ----------

I thought Hust was the optimist. Guess I was wrong!

How am I not showing optimism? I'm just explaining what we need to work on.

Worry not, young Jedi whom just went to the dark side. We got this.

 

[AndreaCristiano]

You are not alone in this endeavor.

I know its just laughable when some blame formations or Conte when in reality its our none clinical finishers

 

[Fake Melo]

I thought Hust was the optimist. Guess I was wrong!

You got husted, bro.

 

[Hust]

I know its just laughable when some blame formations or Conte when in reality its our none clinical finishers

Well, to be honest the formation does have an effect. Even though none of us really like the 352 formation, it still created enough chances to beat Parma. But, as we know, or offense didn't convert.

433 is the way to go.

 

[Salvatore]

One of the forwards haven't found his scoring boots because it is extremely difficult to do that from the bench.

What I implied to say when I have been saying that the 3-5-2 is ok with him so he would remain unbeaten is that when the game is running he does not have the courage to change the formation fearing he would lose the game.

Right, I get your point now, but disagree that it's because of fear. I really think he wants to see two successful formations for this team, and chance creation in some of the 3-5-2 matches (Roma Coppa, Milan Coppa, Parma) haven't been lacking. Another successful coach has been trying to use a second system lately as well.

 

[Hust]

You got husted, bro.

This. ^

 

[Joe]

Why is Boriello starting before Matri? How does that make any sense what so ever?

 

[WΏΏdy?]

I know its just laughable when some blame formations or Conte when in reality its our none clinical finishers

Sure a lot of players get heat for not being able to finish. I'm a big Conte fan but he deserves the heat as well for not being flexible and failing to use better players at his disposal. A few shades of Dumb Nerdy.