[Serie A] Juventus 2-1 Atalanta, Mar 28th, 2010 (4 Viewers)

M.O.M

  • Sissoko

  • Melo

  • Giovinco

  • Del Piero

  • Marchisio

  • Buffon


Results are only viewable after voting.
Jan 14, 2010
270
1. Yes, of course. When have they ever been wrong?

2. Because he is the new Messi.
1 How many times these papers have correctly predicted Juve's formation? many times.

2 Giovinco is the type of player that Barca, Madrid, Arsenal, teams who love to play beautiful football like. Only Juventus and Serie A clubs don't know what beautiful football is.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,893
1 How many times these papers have correctly predicted Juve's formation? many times.

2 Giovinco is the type of player that Barca, Madrid, Arsenal, teams who love to play beautiful football like. Only Juventus and Serie A clubs don't know beautiful football is.
1. The day before the game I'd say it's about 10% of the time. Maximum.

2.
a) Different people have different thoughts about what beautiful football is. Personally, I detest Barca's style, while I do appreciate Arsenal's for example.
b) Right now, not a single big team is interested in Giovinco. Which is obviously nothing more than common sense, since he barely plays.
 

JBF

اختك يا زمن
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
The best possible line-up IMO:
Manni
Canna---Legro
Zebina-------------------------Grosso

Sissoko---Marchisio

Candreva----Diego----Seba

Trezi

Yet we won't see that happen.
 
Jan 14, 2010
270
1. The day before the game I'd say it's about 10% of the time. Maximum.

2.
a) Different people have different thoughts about what beautiful football is. Personally, I detest Barca's style, while I do appreciate Arsenal's for example.
b) Right now, not a single big team is interested in Giovinco. Which is obviously nothing more than common sense, since he barely plays.
just wait and see when the summer comes around.
 

Alessandro

Senior Member
Sep 13, 2002
1,210
b) Right now, not a single big team is interested in Giovinco. Which is obviously nothing more than common sense, since he barely plays.
There is no reason for smart teams to "be interested in" Gio.
It's more clever to get him for a little money after WC (where he don't play) and this season at all (where he also don't play). So it's good for them to keep silence right now.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
There is no reason for smart teams to "be interested in" Gio.
It's more clever to get him for a little money after WC (where he don't play) and this season at all (where he also don't play). So it's good for them to keep silence right now.
But how des a team judge someones value when that certain someone doesn't even play?
 

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
No Chiellini, no Canna. Zebina at CB and Grygera at RB were so fucked. Seems we'll have to try and outscore them. Giovinco please.

Oooops Canna is not suspended my bad.


Zebina-Canna-Legro-Grosso

Marchisio-Melo

Candreva-Diego-Giovinco

Amauri
 

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
I hope Sissoko does not play and for Del Piero to be given a break for 60 minutes then to replace Diego. In reality it will be:-


Manninger

Zebina-Canna-Legro-Grosso

Sissoko-Melo-Marchisio(Yeah lets fuck his development)

Diego-Candreva

Trez/Amauri

Bullshit formation.
 

PhRoZeN

Livin with Mediocre
Mar 29, 2006
16,931
I hope to see atleast one primavera player or (gio) tomorrow. The usual wishful thinking I guess. I know its not going to happen and never will but it would have proberly been the only thing that would pull me to watch tomorrows game.
 

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
Honestly Giovinco should be playing this game there is no reason for him not to. Sissoko has not trained since today so he should not be starting and Del Piero cannot handle two games in three days. This is the perfect time for some 4-2-3-1 goodness. I'm also getting rather sick of seeing Marchisio out wide to accomodate Melo/Sissoko. MARCHISIO IS A FUCKING CM ZACH YOU FUCKING DOLT.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)