Of course, and it should.
it shouldn't actually. let's not create a precedent for other clubs to fuck around with zero confirmed cases and an injured player in reference to the fiduciary isolation proposed by local authorities. i'm all for beating these bitches on the pitch, and i'm also all for not letting them do whatever fancies their mood or momentary interest.
one can argue that the match should have been delayed by either the authorities or the league beforehand, and it's a valid argument. but it wasn't rescheduled, so napoli was supposed to show up. they didn't and they should simply suffer the consequences.
does anyone know the klaksvik - slovan bratislava story? here you go:
https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/abo...efa-champions-league-first-qualifying-round-/
https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Award_7356__internet_publication_.pdf
long story short, slovan bratislava traveled to faroe islands for a cl qualifier after testing all group members negative in slovakia. then the local authorities retested them, and found two positive cases, and moved the entire team to quarantine. uefa was kind enough to reschedule the match, and let slovan bring an other team (full of yout players if i'm not mistaken) to play the match, but one of them tested positive as well, so the faroe authorities put the 2nd bunch of slovan players in quarantine too. slovan didn't show up for the 2nd match, uefa awarded the match with a 3-0 result to the faroe team. slovan turned to cas to appeal the uefa verdict, but cas agreed with uefa, so tough shit or not, klaksvik got the 3 points.
now, napoli didn't even show up, and didn't even have a travel restriction.