And now we have similar people saying that we should give Zacherroni time and praise him for getting a few good results despite playing like absolute neanderthals.
Is he doing this? Yes.
How on earth can he get so much critics then?
Even a great coach will need time and it's questionable if he'll make this set of players play nice football and superiorly win. Even less an average coach like Zaccheroni can do it.
We all knew this and we all agreed when Zac came that the only thing that matters now are the wins. We knew that he's not able to make this team play great. We at least knew that in this short amount of time he's definitely not able to do it and fix what his predecessors did with this team and with their player choice.
So why do some criticize him for the 3 wins in a row just as much as they criticized Zero for the thousand defeats, for getting us eliminated from CL in December and for eliminating us from every other competition we were in?
I'll tell you why. Because Zac came with a reputation of an awful coach while Ciro is a club legend. Zac can win us the league, Ciro can get us relegated and still the critics on them will be the same.
Ah, the bias.
