tuttosport are being very nice here. the two situations aren't fully comparable because of one fact: juventus and agnelli reported our own ultras, while inda denied any connection with them until they were presented hard evidence, when they threw in the victim card
yet agnelli, then juventus president, got a 1 year suspension (figc prosecutor asked for 2 year ban, jury said 1 year, reduced to half a year on appeal), while marotta, current inda president, pictured multiple times with literal mafiosi, was not even prosecuted
what zanetti, inzaghi or calhanoglu deserve is an other story. you won't find anything similar on agnelli:
if you want to read just one of many, many articles:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.il...o_chi_e_news_biglietti_champions-8385530.html
executive summary: ultras called inzaghi (they had his number), they asked for 200 tickets, inzaghi didn't tell them to fuck off as he should have, but told them that he'll ask marotta and zanetti for the tickets.
NOTHING SIMILAR was going on between agnelli and the ultras
inda even hired the sister of a ndrangheta member to take care of the hospitality relations within the club:
https://www.lettera43.it/inter-mafia-ultras-sorella-marco-ferdico-gloria-rosa-hospitality-lavora/
anyway, pointless to post every article there is about this case. for me it's crystal clear that the two cases are not comparable, and i cannot explain how and why marotta walks unharmed if there's no systematic corruption that protects him. if it happened at siena or bologna, odds are their president would have been banned. agnelli was banned for much less already. feel free to make your own conclusions.