A couple of days ago, I meant to ask your opinion on something but forgot. I saw Football Italia quoting a Tuttosport article, so I checked the original. Tuttosport argued that Inzaghi and Calhanoglu didn’t even deserve that one-match ban because, according to them, they did nothing serious at all. They compared their case to Agnelli’s and claimed it was essentially the same, only that his punishment was draconian.
Their point, as I understood it, isn’t that Inter were being favored or treated better than they should be, but that Agnelli, and by extension, Juve, were punished far more harshly than they deserved.
Honestly, I kind of agree, even though I know that you don't. Especially after Agnelli declared war on UEFA and lost, we’ve been screwed over more than once.
P.S: I found the article:
https://www.tuttosport.com/news/cal...differenze_tra_inzaghi_calhanoglu_e_agnelli/4
"
Simone Inzaghi and Hakan Çalhanoğlu do not deserve a harsher punishment. In fact, they might not even deserve a one-match ban. They were naive in engaging with the fans, but they - like almost all coaches and players - are caught in uncomfortable situations where it’s hard to come out unscathed, and the goal is to get hurt as little as possible, because the relationship between clubs and ultras is a complex and dirty mechanism.
The problem isn’t the one-match ban - the problem is the twelve months and all the other ‘small’ differences."