Sergio Agüero - ST - Atletico Madrid (55 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Powis

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2009
8,495
#82
You're right but hopefully we could convince him somehow. We could offer him a lot of money, promise him to build the team around him and we have an exciting future to look forward to with a new stadium and a lot of money to build an excellent squad with. And since he's from Argentina, I think he would be more at home in Italy than England.

And yeah, almost forgot, we're a bigger and more prestigious team than Chelsea. :)
You're right, Juve is much bigger and prestigiuos club than chelsea, but now even fulham are stronger than us.

Diego and Aguero tandem would be fantastic..
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
#84
No, our politics will start to make sense.

Last year we played 442 and got diego. We had no real plan so we had to settle for Grosso and a loan of Caceres in order to have the squad for 4312.

This makes sense and fits the coach. Its probably bullshit, but Aguero would be the shit for us.
We had 2 clueless coaches last season, I think they didn't know what to play at the end.

Diego is the real playmaker and a type of player that can play almost anywhere.
They could try to convert him but no, instead of that Zaccheroni tried his 3-5-2.

I think a good coach would try more.
 

Jasp

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2009
1,041
#85
I agree, our coached failed and Diego can be converted to SS or LM imo.

But that does change the fact that Secco and Blanc also failed in acquiring a complete squad for 4312. Now it is likely 442. If that is a given, then Aguero is more useful than Diego as he is a natural SS. Our board are at least thinking the right things, if this is true.

Diego is one of my favourite Juve players right now. And I certainly won't be upset if he is here next season. But that will not change the fact that this transfer makes sense. You get a perfect player for the system. I'd even argue you get a better player overall. He is 21 and could really take the place of DP.
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
#86
I agree, our coached failed and Diego can be converted to SS or LM imo.

But that does change the fact that Secco and Blanc also failed in acquiring a complete squad for 4312. Now it is likely 442. If that is a given, then Aguero is more useful than Diego as he is a natural SS. Our board are at least thinking the right things, if this is true.

Diego is one of my favourite Juve players right now. And I certainly won't be upset if he is here next season. But that will not change the fact that this transfer makes sense. You get a perfect player for the system. I'd even argue you get a better player overall. He is 21 and could really take the place of DP.
Our real achievement would be keeping Diego and bringing Aguero, but losing first for the second is really stupid in my opinion.
This move will show our real ambitions ...although I'm afraid we already showed our ambitions by picking the new coach.
 

Jasp

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2009
1,041
#87
Our real achievement would be keeping Diego and bringing Aguero, but losing first for the second is really stupid in my opinion.
This move will show our real ambitions ...although I'm afraid we already showed our ambitions by picking the new coach.
I think I agree on that. However, that implies Diego on left, righ or as a CM.

So which one is better
Krasic Marchiso Diego Gio
or
Krasic Marchiso Melo/D'ago Giovico

Krasic Marchiso Melo Diego
or
Krasic Marchiso Melo Giovinco

If the option with Diego in it, is not the best one, why not trade him?
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
#88
I think I agree on that. However, that implies Diego on left, righ or as a CM.

So which one is better
Krasic Marchiso Diego Gio
or
Krasic Marchiso Melo/D'ago Giovico

Krasic Marchiso Melo Diego
or
Krasic Marchiso Melo Giovinco

If the option with Diego in it, is not the best one, why not trade him?
Just one question Jasp, in those formations is Krasic RM or LM, I mean don't know how to watch those formations?
 

Jasp

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2009
1,041
#89
Just one question Jasp, in those formations is Krasic RM or LM, I mean don't know how to watch those formations?
Yeah I can see the confusion. I meant Krasic as the RW. Probably should be xxx instead. Freudian slip.

First one is basically Diego opposed to Melo of acquiring someone like D'ago. Second one is Diego versus Giovinco as LW.
 

B3N

Floro Fckin' Flores
May 16, 2010
6,659
#91
I rather we let Atleti sell Aguero to Man city, Chelsea or any other team that would pay that much money for Kun..
Then we sell Tiago (8mil) to them as they would have the money to buy him..


Offer Arsenal Melo + 28mil (that extra 20mil in Kun's deal + 8mil Tiago) for Robin Van Persie..

We will have Marchisio-Momo-Poulsen in center mid and we can keep Ekdal for reserve.


oh well..





plus those who are saying why would Aguero choose us over Chelsea! there are alot of reason we are the better option for him.

1) we can easily afford his wages ( our highest paid players like Camo and Trez are on their way out)

2) there is simply no room for Aguero at Chelsea as Ancelotti already said we don't need him.
what's the purpose of going to a CL team when you won't get any playing time there..




That Diego +tiago + 20mil deal for Aguero is a robbery FFS.
They will laugh at us all the way to the bank.
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
19,348
#92
1st Team
Aguero Pazzini
Giovinco Marchisio Diego Krasic
Criscito Chiellini Bonucci Cassani
Buffon

Sub
Del Piero Iaquinta
Rossi Momo Melo Candreva
De Ceglie Ariaudo Legrottaglie ???
Manninger

Backup
Immobile
Ekdal
Marrone
Iago
Diego and Marchisio at the middle it could lead to creative things but I`m not sure about this midfield ability to defend Giovinco is like a cone and he might be a great player in the making but if he looses some balls it would be difficult to recover as like I said Giovinco is a cone while Marchisio is the only one who is good at defending (Diego is a good defender for AM or SS but not for a CM) Krasic didn`t watch a lot of him so I have noticed his attacking abilities more than his defensive ones
I believe Marchisio Diego is a bit weak defensively but I might be wrong

also I believe that if we get Aguero than it will be instead of Diego
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
#94
Yeah I can see the confusion. I meant Krasic as the RW. Probably should be xxx instead. Freudian slip.

First one is basically Diego opposed to Melo of acquiring someone like D'ago. Second one is Diego versus Giovinco as LW.
Ok than :) Krasic as RW.

Well listen, all those formations are fine, and I really think that Diego has the potential to play everywhere. With his skills and awesome technique I think that he is great everywhere. The myth here is that he can't and he won't be able to play anywhere except the behind the striker(s) role.

Having him in a team is a great achievement and I think that he is needed by this team. I like his way of playing and honestly I think that he was our only true move for these past 5 years, thank God we got him. The problem were the coaches , if Jose Mourinho managed to find a place for Sneijder I think that finding a place for Diego is a piece of cake than. But the problem is that Jose Mourinho is a pure class while Ranieri is better than both coaches after him but 10 grades behind Mourinho.
 

Jasp

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2009
1,041
#97
Ok than :) Krasic as RW.

Well listen, all those formations are fine, and I really think that Diego has the potential to play everywhere. With his skills and awesome technique I think that he is great everywhere. The myth here is that he can't and he won't be able to play anywhere except the behind the striker(s) role.

Having him in a team is a great achievement and I think that he is needed by this team. I like his way of playing and honestly I think that he was our only true move for these past 5 years, thank God we got him. The problem were the coaches , if Jose Mourinho managed to find a place for Sneijder I think that finding a place for Diego is a piece of cake than. But the problem is that Jose Mourinho is a pure class while Ranieri is better than both coaches after him but 10 grades behind Mourinho.
The problem, in my opinion, is not finding a position for Diego, as much as it is the art of the possible in the transfer market. Diego could be the only way we get Aguero. And I think our team will benefit in the end by that. That is why I argue for it.
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
#98
To the guys that want to trade Diego for someone...
So what now, Del Neri wants 4-4-2, let's trade Diego (and some cash) for Aguero.
Than if Del Neri fails, Aguero's price will be extra lower than it was before so than we need to find another coach...ok , let's see who is available...woooow let's bring Hiddink yeah yeah he was spotted in some caffe in Turin...another day it was Benitez in Turin...our board will wait some Monday for the changes and until than we will be informed about Del Bosque, Lippi and Capello in the same Turin caffe....than what...well nothing happens and in the meanwhile that cunt from Uzbekistan is gonna reject us again and suddenly we will be in the situation to dream about Fatih Terim and the similar ones....Finally theeeeeeee Monday arrives and the board are appointing another great name as our coach GENTILE...but heeey he prefers 3-1-2-3-1 tactics and there is't space for Aguero, ok let's trade him for Podolski plus 5 mil Euros.

These are our plans.
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
The problem, in my opinion, is not finding a position for Diego, as much as it is the art of the possible in the transfer market. Diego could be the only way we get Aguero. And I think our team will benefit in the end by that. That is why I argue for it.
Keep Diego and if it is possible bring Aguero, I'm for that 100%.:tup:

But including Diego in any kind of deal is the thing I'm against of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 53)