Same Sex Marriage (17 Viewers)

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Ever smoked weed? Believe it or not kid weed isn't just like they tell you at school. It's not what your government tell you it is. Ive smoked weed many times and been able to do assignments, papers, research, sport and more. If that is your logic then why arent we still without technology when alcohol is illegal, a far worse drug in every single way.

Since this is a god thread, isnt weed a natural substance? Did god accidently put weed in his perfect world? I dont think God makes mistakes. Does banning 'nature' since you were so found of it earlier in the gay discussion not seem alittle off?
Yes, the rebels of Sierra Leone and Liberia became more efficient kkilling machines whenever they had weed.
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
The foot soldiers of the mexican revolutionary army smoked weed, and they made a little famous song:

La cucaracha, La cucaracha,
Ya no puede caminar
Porque no tiene, porque no tiene
Marihuana que fumar

This translates to:

The cockroach, the cockroach,
Can no longer walk,
because he hasnt, because he hasnt,
had his marijuana to smoke.
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Ever smoked weed? Believe it or not kid weed isn't just like they tell you at school. It's not what your government tell you it is. Ive smoked weed many times and been able to do assignments, papers, research, sport and more. If that is your logic then why arent we still without technology when alcohol is illegal, a far worse drug in every single way.

Since this is a god thread, isnt weed a natural substance? Did god accidently put weed in his perfect world? I dont think God makes mistakes. Does banning 'nature' since you were so found of it earlier in the gay discussion not seem alittle off?
I agree that arguement holds water in some respects, but then the case of cocaine comes in. Thats a plant, and it is very harmful. Same with poison on the earth too.
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++


Yes, the rebels of Sierra Leone and Liberia became more efficient kkilling machines whenever they had weed.
Interesting. Though you could give them handjobs and that would probably make them more efficient too. Why must you add an irrelevent factor to the discussion?

agree that arguement holds water in some respects, but then the case of cocaine comes in. Thats a plant, and it is very harmful. Same with poison on the earth too.
Cocaine is a chemical drug. Poison on the earth? Is it illegal? Is it illegal to go find some poison in the forrest and kill yourself with it? I'm not talking about how dangerous they are, only why they are illegal.

This dosen't even need to be discussed. Anyone who dosent take exception to being able to buy cigerattes at 16 but can never being able to legally buy weed needs their head examined. It's obvious it is because these drugs are non-taxable, it's not because your government cares about you.

iBianconeri, yes I know about the medical side of weed. You obviously are quite ignorant to the discussion here. You don't realise the point i'm making at all and your happy to believe the tv adverts. Thats fine. Also you might want to look up sarcasim in the dictionary and see if in some strange little way your mind can relate that to the post I made that your having a panic attack over.

Also no offence, but a teenage kid sitting on a forum laughing at my photo really isn't going to annoy me. Think about it.
 

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Interesting. Though you could give them handjobs and that would probably make them more efficient too. Why must you add an irrelevent factor to the discussion?



Cocaine is a chemical drug. Poison on the earth? Is it illegal? Is it illegal to go find some poison in the forrest and kill yourself with it? I'm not talking about how dangerous they are, only why they are illegal.

This dosen't even need to be discussed. Anyone who dosent take exception to being able to buy cigerattes at 16 but can never being able to legally buy weed needs their head examined. It's obvious it is because these drugs are non-taxable, it's not because your government cares about you.

iBianconeri, yes I know about the medical side of weed. You obviously are quite ignorant to the discussion here. You don't realise the point i'm making at all and your happy to believe the tv adverts. Thats fine. Also you might want to look up sarcasim in the dictionary and see if in some strange little way your mind can relate that to the post I made that your having a panic attack over.

Also no offence, but a teenage kid sitting on a forum laughing at my photo really isn't going to annoy me. Think about it.
In your estimation, you seem to be the only person with knowledge. If you had bothered reading between the lines, you'd have noticed that I was implying that "weeding up" tends to make people do things that they otherwise wouldn't do.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,244
++ [ originally posted by fabiana ] ++


A gay couple adopting a child is not going to harm you. I think that if they fought this much to be able to legally adopt children theyre not gonna screw up
Of course its not going to harm me, but it might harm the KID. Imagine going to school everyday having to deal with "haha here comes the bastard fag child." The kid would get so much abuse from his peers, not to mention the affects of the household on him/her. So gay adoption would hurt others ie the kid who is adopted. That is just wrong.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,244
++ [ originally posted by Dust ] ++


I disagree - it's common for religious people to believe that they hold a monopoly on morals and correct living...the fact is fewer people are religious these days and its perfectly possible to have a decent moral code without any religion in your life. Just as it's not uncommon to have religious people behave in all sorts of hypocritical and vile ways.

having a free for all with no respect for human life.

Isn't that what's going on at the moment anyway?
That's a great argument. First you tell me that fewer people are religious today and those agnostic people can hold a decent moral code. Then you imply the world at the moment has no respect for human life. That's a rather funny argument that does not disprove my point.

You hold a code of conduct because that's what law requires you to do. I'm not saying people who do not believe in God are bad people, however without religion this world would be much more fecked up. Without religion there would be no laws respecting human life.
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++


In your estimation, you seem to be the only person with knowledge. If you had bothered reading between the lines, you'd have noticed that I was implying that "weeding up" tends to make people do things that they otherwise wouldn't do.
Not at all. I just missed your point. You left that one a little vague.

Wouldn't do things they otherwise wouldn't? Perhaps if by that you mean making a fool of yourself. But killing someone? I don't really see that as an argument against weed. Infact I find it extremely hard to believe that wouldnt have the opposite effect.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,244
Weed makes you feel happy and laughing at everything is pretty much all you do on it. If you want to talk about a drug that makes you wanna kill someone talk about PCP.
 

Emma

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
3,753
++ [ originally posted by iBianconeri ] ++
oh man!! i'm so sorry for even replying to you

:rofl::rofl:


Fvcking Pothead!!!
When you do this you have to put your own pic up. Its a rule here. Otherwise your a worm :D

Lets see it stud
 

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
Weed in small quantities makes you feel happy.

Weed in more significant quantities....

DO NOT ARGUE WITH ME ON THAT ONE. I DO NOT HOLD A MONOPOLY OF KNOWLEDGE IN ANY FIELD, BUT ON THIS ONE...

I HAVE SEEN WITH MY OWN EYES WHAT A BIT OF HIGH CAN MAKE EVEN CHILDREN DO.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Of course its not going to harm me, but it might harm the KID. Imagine going to school everyday having to deal with "haha here comes the bastard fag child." The kid would get so much abuse from his peers, not to mention the affects of the household on him/her. So gay adoption would hurt others ie the kid who is adopted. That is just wrong.

Perhaps. But, legalising gay marriagat and talking and teaching about it in school would lead to it's acceptance in the mainstream society and especially amongst children. Your argument could also be used in racially or religiously mixed marriages, especially some 30-40 years ago in racist america, but fact is that by accepting it and allowing it to be a part of everyday normal life it will be normalised and become a functioning part of society and life, same as straight marriages.


++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++

You hold a code of conduct because that's what law requires you to do.
Religious people also hold a code of conduct because of the law, that isnt really a good argumen. It's only that their law is the Bible, or Qur'an, or whatever, and their fear of punishement keeps them from doing harm. Not very different from atheists that have a code of conduct based on the law, is it?
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Interesting. Though you could give them handjobs and that would probably make them more efficient too. Why must you add an irrelevent factor to the discussion?



Cocaine is a chemical drug. Poison on the earth? Is it illegal? Is it illegal to go find some poison in the forrest and kill yourself with it? I'm not talking about how dangerous they are, only why they are illegal.

This dosen't even need to be discussed. Anyone who dosent take exception to being able to buy cigerattes at 16 but can never being able to legally buy weed needs their head examined. It's obvious it is because these drugs are non-taxable, it's not because your government cares about you.

iBianconeri, yes I know about the medical side of weed. You obviously are quite ignorant to the discussion here. You don't realise the point i'm making at all and your happy to believe the tv adverts. Thats fine. Also you might want to look up sarcasim in the dictionary and see if in some strange little way your mind can relate that to the post I made that your having a panic attack over.

Also no offence, but a teenage kid sitting on a forum laughing at my photo really isn't going to annoy me. Think about it.
Powder cocaine is the crushed leaves of the coca plant, even though it undergoes a chemical reaction, one could still chew cocaine leaves and get a high off that.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,244
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



Perhaps. But, legalising gay marriagat and talking and teaching about it in school would lead to it's acceptance in the mainstream society and especially amongst children. Your argument could also be used in racially or religiously mixed marriages, especially some 30-40 years ago in racist america, but fact is that by accepting it and allowing it to be a part of everyday normal life it will be normalised and become a functioning part of society and life, same as straight marriages.
Still doesn't work. I mean what do we want to do, build a society of gays? I don't think so.



Religious people also hold a code of conduct because of the law, that isnt really a good argumen. It's only that their law is the Bible, or Qur'an, or whatever, and their fear of punishement keeps them from doing harm. Not very different from atheists that have a code of conduct based on the law, is it?
That's my point Zlatan. I am rather certain that without Religion there would be no feasible laws in our land.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)