More dangerous than what? The the public retoric which itself has been incredibly hawkish?
Joe Biden himself said the only ending here is regime change. A number of other US govt officials have floated vague statements about no fly zones or even boots on the ground in ukraine
More dangerous than what? The the public retoric which itself has been incredibly hawkish?
Joe Biden himself said the only ending here is regime change. A number of other US govt officials have floated vague statements about no fly zones or even boots on the ground in ukraine
Maybe from the press but I don't think any talk from govt officials in this situation, in which we've cut off direct communication with the Russians, is "just talk" anymore
Maybe from the press but I don't think any talk from govt officials in this situation, in which we've cut off direct communication with the Russians, is "just talk" anymore
I can ask for many things (including regime change) there’s a difference in actively getting involved and just asking for something. That’s what I meant.
The only danger would be Russia using nuclear weapons. If you think that is a distinct possibility then these leaks are dangerous, yes, but Russia won’t be starting a conventional war with NATO.
The only danger would be Russia using nuclear weapons. If you think that is a distinct possibility then these leaks are dangerous, yes, but Russia won’t be starting a conventional war with NATO.
So that’s what I mean, unless they are willing to escalate to a nuclear level, there’s nothing they can do about the US providing this sort of intel to Ukraine.
And if they are willing to take this nuclear, it was probably just a matter of time anyways, unfortunately.
The only danger would be Russia using nuclear weapons. If you think that is a distinct possibility then these leaks are dangerous, yes, but Russia won’t be starting a conventional war with NATO.