We won the scudetto without him and CL quarter-finals would be the target with or without him too. More like if he sells few hundred thousand shirts and brings us a nice fan base in Netherlands (which is probable) he already paid for himself.
Van persie has much more expirience in europe and domestically, has shown to be able to lead a lesser quality (wich arsenal is after all the sales), grabbing a very nice 30 goal topscorer award in the end, and thats not done by countering the opponent but trying to play football.
He is likely the cheapest in therms of transfer fee of the 3
Currently he is the best of the 3, has the highest chance of getting us far the comming 2 seasons, and has the best commercial options
this offsets an age of 29 and high wages.
I am not saying he is the best option, but i'm only saying, that he would be equally good for us then the other 3.
personally i prefer Higuain but think his fee will be impossible to meet. I would gladly take cavani ahead of van persie because of lower age, alot lower wages, offset against less impact the first 2 years then rvp could
Higuain would demand lower wages than RVP, but higher than those of Cavani.
RVP may or may not cost less (since he's on the final year of his contract), but it also depends on who is going after him besides us.
agreed, but i think we arent gonna like the fee that comes for higuain