Quagliarella (15 Viewers)

tonykart

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2007
1,595
It would be smart to wait 1 year. After all Quagliarella has only had 1 year like last year. lets see if it is legit (I think it is), then we can pick him up. He will definately be a great player to have on Juventus for a long time. I think he will be a permanent part of our National Team too.
 
Jul 2, 2006
19,431
It would be smart to wait 1 year. After all Quagliarella has only had 1 year like last year. lets see if it is legit (I think it is), then we can pick him up. He will definately be a great player to have on Juventus for a long time. I think he will be a permanent part of our National Team too.
welcome

and this Quagliarella is not necessary for now,use Palladino.
 

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,413
It would be smart to wait 1 year. After all Quagliarella has only had 1 year like last year. lets see if it is legit (I think it is), then we can pick him up. He will definately be a great player to have on Juventus for a long time. I think he will be a permanent part of our National Team too.
ya he should spend another season with udinese and we will see how good he really is. but what position he exactlly plays?
 

tonykart

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2007
1,595
ya he should spend another season with udinese and we will see how good he really is. but what position he exactlly plays?
He is a striker. I would hate to say he is a SS, so he couldn't sub for DP and play in the same position, but he is similar (in a sense) to Ibrahimovic because he can play next to Trezeguet, move around, and keep the offense moving. Of course, he can blast a few wondergoals. Quagliarella is a good hard worker with some nice skills and a ton of potential.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,978
AC JUVENTUS: Palladino most useful in order for arrival of Quagliarella

It seems that Udinese can be available to transfer to Juventus Fabio Quagliarella, to pact that Juventus turns to Udinese Raffaele Palladino. Without the opportunity to play titular to Torino, Palladino would be the ideal solution in order to obtain Fabio Quagliarella in the 2008/09.

transfermarketweb.com
 

francesco

Till death do us part!
Jul 25, 2006
2,420
AC JUVENTUS: Palladino most useful in order for arrival of Quagliarella

It seems that Udinese can be available to transfer to Juventus Fabio Quagliarella, to pact that Juventus turns to Udinese Raffaele Palladino. Without the opportunity to play titular to Torino, Palladino would be the ideal solution in order to obtain Fabio Quagliarella in the 2008/09.

transfermarketweb.com
Palladino wont be going anywhere, Ranieri rates him highly
he is vital for the future of Juventus
 

AngelaL

Jinx Minx
Aug 25, 2006
10,215

The Arif

Senior Member
Jan 31, 2004
12,564
AC JUVENTUS: Palladino most useful in order for arrival of Quagliarella

It seems that Udinese can be available to transfer to Juventus Fabio Quagliarella, to pact that Juventus turns to Udinese Raffaele Palladino. Without the opportunity to play titular to Torino, Palladino would be the ideal solution in order to obtain Fabio Quagliarella in the 2008/09.

transfermarketweb.com

AC Juventus? What the hell is that
 

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
It would be smart to wait 1 year. After all Quagliarella has only had 1 year like last year. lets see if it is legit (I think it is), then we can pick him up. He will definately be a great player to have on Juventus for a long time. I think he will be a permanent part of our National Team too.
Agreed. We don't need him now and it would be wiser to wait another season. Who knows, he could end up being a one hit wonder like Legro. Doubtful but you never know.
 

tonykart

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2007
1,595
Why not just make Udinese an offer they can't refuse... oh yeah Moggi isn't here anymore damn...

They will sell him at the end of the year and we won't need to give up one of our most promising young talents in Palladino. This is BS. Quagliarella and Barzagli should be ours next year. That will be music to my ears.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)