Well, a tripod if you shoot landacapes or architecture. But there really is no need to keep the ISO so low these days imo. Rather have a slightly noisy pic than a blurry one that's basically unusable.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Photography (14 Viewers)
- Thread starter s4tch
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
You can denoise it in post? 
In Capture One for example.
I'd always shoot RAW+JPG. If you need to do more heavy editing you definitely want to edit the RAW file, as it is way more flexible than the JPG. But unless you shoot over 3200 iso, I wouldn't worry much at all. The casual viewer doesn't zoom in to 100% to search for noise.
If you have a REALLY noisy one, what I do at times is to remove the noise, but then you are often left with rather muddy details, so you ADD your own bit of noise after denoising.
- - - Updated - - -
Get a camera @j0ker
In Capture One for example.
I'd always shoot RAW+JPG. If you need to do more heavy editing you definitely want to edit the RAW file, as it is way more flexible than the JPG. But unless you shoot over 3200 iso, I wouldn't worry much at all. The casual viewer doesn't zoom in to 100% to search for noise.
If you have a REALLY noisy one, what I do at times is to remove the noise, but then you are often left with rather muddy details, so you ADD your own bit of noise after denoising.
- - - Updated - - -
Get a camera @j0ker
Last edited:
You can denoise it in post? 
In Capture One for example.
I'd always shoot RAW+JPG. If you need to do more heavy editing you definitely want to edit the RAW file, as it is way more flexible than the JPG. But unless you shoot over 3200 iso, I wouldn't worry much at all. The casual viewer doesn't zoom in to 100% to search for noise.
If you have a REALLY noisy one, what I do at times is to remove the noise, but then you are often left with rather muddy details, so you ADD your own bit of noise after denoising.
- - - Updated - - -
Get a camera @j0ker
In Capture One for example.
I'd always shoot RAW+JPG. If you need to do more heavy editing you definitely want to edit the RAW file, as it is way more flexible than the JPG. But unless you shoot over 3200 iso, I wouldn't worry much at all. The casual viewer doesn't zoom in to 100% to search for noise.
If you have a REALLY noisy one, what I do at times is to remove the noise, but then you are often left with rather muddy details, so you ADD your own bit of noise after denoising.
- - - Updated - - -
Get a camera @j0ker
Right now Im trying to learn how to take a good photo. When I have 50 photos I really like (I have 0 right now) I'll sit down and learn capture one.
Sendt fra min CLT-L29 med Tapatalk
oh so finally that's available too. thanks!
did you see this? https://fujifilm-x.com/global/support/download/firmware/cameras/
fuji released a new firmware for many bodies. bug fixes, 50mm f1 compatibility on the menu for most cameras, nothing to write home about.
did you see this? https://fujifilm-x.com/global/support/download/firmware/cameras/
fuji released a new firmware for many bodies. bug fixes, 50mm f1 compatibility on the menu for most cameras, nothing to write home about.
@DAiDEViL she is too fast 
Bö fags. Next to me, a pensioner couple in partner look Jack Wolfskin jackets yelled HEJA so loudly and so unexpectedly that JTB almost fell on his ass.
Ingrid crashed into the same piece of fence twice, they made the corner wider after Quali but she still ran into it
Bö fags. Next to me, a pensioner couple in partner look Jack Wolfskin jackets yelled HEJA so loudly and so unexpectedly that JTB almost fell on his ass.
Ingrid crashed into the same piece of fence twice, they made the corner wider after Quali but she still ran into it
Both nice. But like not tempted at all here. The 50's would directly compare to my Canon 85 1.8 (effectively 1.3 on the speedbooster). And I'm really happy with it. Same with the Canon nifty 50 instead of a 35 from fuji or viltrox. The autofocus may not be usable for video, but for stills it works fine for me...and for a fraction of the price too.
viltrox 56mm isn't too expensive either. you already have the speedbooster + your 85, so it's not worth considering either of these two. but for someone looking for a portrait lens, the viltrox 56mm for around 300 $/£/€ can be a serious contender vs the fuji or anything else. 