Oh so Im going to have to do this then huh. Fine.
++ [ originally posted by Layce Erayce ] ++
Claire, I didnt want to baby you, knowing that your a smart, intelligent girl, but here we go:
That was in post #232, just for your reference, Claire. I dont mean to make it look that obvious that you completely missed the point I made, but thats what happened.
Next time you can work on your debating skills and your attitude before you argue with me again.
This is cute. He thinks he has won an 'argument' by making a point noone cared to address because it was so obvious and already well established.
Hate to break it to you, but Im not arguing in the first place. I wanted you to discuss (not argue) why (here's point forum, full paragraphs seem to confuse you)
1: You are here if it's so bad
2. You are in the hangout, as without coming here you have a 'real' football forum like you desire.
3. You take away the hangout (you know that parts you have a problem with, the parts that stop this being a real football forum) and what do you have? I put that as a question to stimulate thought.
That was post 226. The original post. Before you decided to have a crack at Blandest. Two points out of the 3 address the above. You picked one. The one that isnt important and I cant be arsed talking about again. The one that my first reply covered already and thus, required no more of my time.
"How would you know? You've read all posts from all my accounts and all posts of the moderators in each discussion about my banning? I returned because noone could find a reason for the ban and because Martin give me a chance again. Since that chance I havn't broken a single rule. The later bans have all been moderator mistakes or I misunderstood and thought we could post freely without censorship."
Did you read it all? No. You have shown to be lacking and are confused as to what you are even talking about.
Did I return because Martin give me another chance and he couldnt pin me for it? Yes. He did give a second chance and in his words 'I wont ban someone because I simply dont like them'.
Was I banned for the good of the forum? Yes, originally. A point you make that I don't even disagree with. So what? It's irrelevent.
Have a broken the rules found in the above navigation? No.
Have some bans been moderator 'mistakes'? Yes. Mikhail has already said he wasn't fully sure on the reason for my latest ban and banned me simply because he assumed I was still banned.
Was I banned because I assumed we could speak freely without censorship? Yes. First ban for cop hating. See everything has been addressed. Within my very first and second posts every single on of your so called 'argument' winning discussion has been put to rest.
Now let's figure out what Josh is talking about.
Now did I say anywhere about moderators having to warrant banning me? Complain about moderators not liking me? Claiming Martin didn't like me? Disagreeing with anything to do with valuable assets to give? A like for Juventuz? A need to justify Juventuz or anything at all to do with how Juventuz is run, how it was run in the past or how it should be run?
Any other pointless crap I missed just add on.
I'll leave you with your own wise words:
"Next time you can work on your debating skills and your attitude before you argue with me again."
Or my words. Next time, get the right argument. Just another member who picks the small part and tries to turn it into the discussion. Why do we do this?
Buy on AliExpress.com
