Official Azzurri (Italy) Euro 2008 Thread (37 Viewers)

[Wings]

we won the world cup because we were the best team, sure we had our slice of luck but there were no controversial decisions from referees which had a deciding factor in the games. These Euro's have been ridiculed with bad refereeing not only against Italy, but against a host of nations. It makes me sick that the media target Italy all the time. Your either with us or against us, simple. You are the pathetic one, retard!

Italy was one of the best teams in WC2006 and that makes it ok if fishy calls are made for your gains. Nice line of thought. I will reiterate that asking UEFA to pressure holland to play their first team in their last match is just pathetic & retarded.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[francesco]

The dive against Australia is controversial but you choose to close an eye on it.

'the dive' is debatable wether you see it as a dive or not. We are talking about offside goals here, where referees had perfect views but chose to go against the Azzurri, so dont give me that shit.

 

[Alen]

I will reiterate that asking UEFA to pressure holland to play their first team in their last match is just pathetic & retarded.

I didn't follow what was happening and i'm not sure if i understood you correctly, so don't laugh at my question :
Did the Italians ask UEFA to pressure the Dutch to play their first XI ?

Because if they did, oh my......

 

[Bjerknes]

'the dive' is debatable wether you see it as a dive or not. We are talking about offside goals here, where referees had perfect views but chose to go against the Azzurri, so dont give me that shit.

So you condone Italian cheating, but abhor any calls made against the Azzurri. Wonderful. Man, you aren't biased whatsoever.

 

[Azzurri7]

The dive against Australia is controversial but you choose to close an eye on it.

Well, Materazzi's red card was the real controversial not the penalty one.

But lets put it this way, it was more like 1-1. Penalty was just about time, because the ref knew he fucked up with Matrix red card.

 

[francesco]

So you condone Italian cheating, but abhor any calls made against the Azzurri. Wonderful. Man, you aren't biased whatsoever.

I 'abhor' the calls that have been made against the Azzurri in these Euro's yes! I DONT condone cheating whatsoever!

 

[Holdon]

The dive against Australia is controversial but you choose to close an eye on it.

So was Materazzi's sending off, but I guess because he's such an asshole he deserved it, right?

 

[francesco]

Andy/Jack 0 - Azzurri fan boys 836729

 

[Holdon]

I didn't follow what was happening and i'm not sure if i understood you correctly, so don't laugh at my question :
Did the Italians ask UEFA to pressure the Dutch to play their first XI ?

Because if they did, oh my......

This bit I don't like. The Dutch have earned the right to field whatever team they choose.

 

[Azzurri7]

So was Materazzi's sending off, but I guess because he's such an asshole he deserved it, right?

If you look at it closely, not even Yellow Card he deserved that day.

 

[Alen]

But lets put it this way, it was more like 1-1. Penalty was just about time, because the ref knew he fucked up with Matrix red card.

No, this can't be right. We can't use lex talionis in football. The code of Hammurabi can not count in the 21st century football. You're talking about eye for an eye, i kill your brother you kill my son.
There are rules. You don't fix a mistake by making an ever bigger one.

 

[Azzurri7]

You don't correct a mistake by making another mistake. And the World Cup victory is not the issue here, the Italians well deserved it as they were the best team out there.

True you don't correct a mistake by making another mistake, but Australia had the advantage for more than 60 minutes to take a lead when Italy were playing 1man down. So Italy were at risk much more than Australia thanks to the ref.

This is why Grosso's penalty was fair.

 

[Bjerknes]

No, this can't be right. We can't use lex talionis in football. The code of Hammurabi can not count in the 21st century football. You're talking about eye for an eye, i kill your brother you kill my son.

But this is the Azzurri mentality... as long as they get the better part of the deal.

 

[Holdon]

You don't correct a mistake by making another mistake.

I totally agree. My point is the Grosso penalty is continually used against Italy whenever we are at the recieving end of a poor decision. Materazzi's red card was call against Italy, yet it hardly gets mentioned. Some of the criticism is deserved, a lot isn't - let's have some balance.

 

[Bjerknes]

I totally agree. My point is the Grosso penalty is continually used against Italy whenever we are at the recieving end of a poor decision. Materazzi's red card was call against Italy, yet it hardly gets mentioned. Some of the criticism is deserved, a lot isn't - let's have some balance.

Balance is impossible on this forum.

 

[francesco]

You don't correct a mistake by making another mistake. And the World Cup victory is not the issue here, the Italians well deserved it as they were the best team out there.

I dont know who to believe more
you with that comment or Domenech when he says he admires Italian football..

 

[Azzurri7]

No, this can't be right. We can't use lex talionis in football. The code of Hammurabi can not count in the 21st century football. You're talking about eye for an eye, i kill your brother you kill my son.
There are rules. You don't fix a mistake by making an ever bigger one.

I'm not talking about eye for an eye. Like I said, the ref was aware of the mistake he did, Australia had the chance to finish the game for more than 60min and they didn't. The Ref waited for a small contact inside their box to award a penalty for the Italians which is fair IMO, whether it was a real contact or not. It was fair because Italy played one man down for almost the entire game.

So I Wouldn't really consider it as eye to an eye more than that Australia fucked it up.

 

[Bjerknes]

It is only a matter of time and I will lose my temper on you, have you read my posts or not? I already replied to you twice ONLY today but you still want to imply that I am an Azzurri hater. Is it so difficult to put anything through your thick skull? Geez!!!

Hey, he said it best: "you're either with us, or against us." You know, he thinks he's Vito Corleone, or something. "Do you reject Satan," and all that other bullshit.

 

[francesco]

It is only a matter of time and I will lose my temper on you, have you read my posts or not? I already replied to you twice ONLY today but you still want to imply that I am an Azzurri hater. Is it so difficult to put anything through your thick skull? Geez!!!

well you know how i feel when it comes to putting anything through your head when im voicing my opinion on this topic.

 

[francesco]

Hey, he said it best: "you're either with us, or against us." You know, he thinks he's Vito Corleone, or something. "Do you reject Satan," and all that other bullshit.

Vito Corleone? wtf