Official Application for Moderator (18 Viewers)
- Thread starter IncuboRossonero
- Start date
- Status
Oops... My advice (cause you sounded kinda desperately) and my remark, that you misspelled my nickname (since you pointed with those capital letters, that people should learn in here: the same goes to you, and you should learn ex to read) made you feel like that?
But back to the point: what PM? I'm talking about that email you sent to me some time ago (if you're going to ask me again, with that stressed face "when" I can tell you, that I can offer you a copy of it, if your memory still refuses to cooperate with you).
Secondly I'm going to "intervene" in all threads I want to in a way I want to - and there is nothing you can do about it.
I will leave my response too all the rest you said, specially that everything you say bears witness to you and only to you, not to me in any way.
You shouldnt expect any further reply, if you're going to talk to me in this way.
----------------------------------------------------------
Majed: your incredible kindness almost made me speechless
Sergio:
OP
Sorry hun but that phrase made absolutely no sense. If you want me to respond I suggest you keep the sentences short and concise because this JAMBLE of words is not helping.
This time I will ask you to re-read my message. I never denied sending you a PM .. I simply stated that MANY individuals received it so don't feel the need to respond to me and point out a mistake because there was not much thought in the PM.
Sorry but here is a tip: this ain't the school yard...nor is it the lane on the way home from school nor is it the summer municipal swimming pool i.e. places where you are most likely to see kids argue. "nothing I can do about it"
how old are you? 8?
HALLEJUH...FREE AT LAST FREE AT LAST...THANK GOD ALMIGHTY I AM FREE AT LAST......
NOTE TO MAJED: If you feel the need to point out my EVIL WAYS once again and drag everyone through that long boring draining shot-us-in the head B.S. PM me dude. The forum is getting BORING ENOUGH.
This time I will ask you to re-read my message. I never denied sending you a PM .. I simply stated that MANY individuals received it so don't feel the need to respond to me and point out a mistake because there was not much thought in the PM.
Sorry but here is a tip: this ain't the school yard...nor is it the lane on the way home from school nor is it the summer municipal swimming pool i.e. places where you are most likely to see kids argue. "nothing I can do about it"
how old are you? 8?
HALLEJUH...FREE AT LAST FREE AT LAST...THANK GOD ALMIGHTY I AM FREE AT LAST......
NOTE TO MAJED: If you feel the need to point out my EVIL WAYS once again and drag everyone through that long boring draining shot-us-in the head B.S. PM me dude. The forum is getting BORING ENOUGH.
While this wasn't my reason for replying to your post to Vit, I'll give you my $0.02.
Your statement, in bold, above isn't %100 true (or actually, what you were trying to say isn't %100 true... You mean "offline" instead of the last "online"). Funny how your telling Vit to be concise when your statements don't even make sense. I usually let these mistakes slide because I understand them (or at least make an attempt to), but you didn't with hers. Take note.
Back to the argument. While our representatives here in the forums are not identical to who we may be "offline," you have to admit that there is some common ground. Sorry, but your example about Pado and Sergio is pure non-sense and shallow. They do it to joke around. You joke around too. I joke around. Nothing wrong with that. However, it's not hard to see beynd the obvious jokes and conversations. I sense that you are referring specifically to the Vinman issue. I'll assume so. I stand by what I have said regarding that issue. How he reacts indeed makes me QUESTION his reactions in the real world. I did nothing more than QUESTION because it IS possible. In short, I disagree with your statement but I also add that there's no way for me to know. The way you made that statement makes it sound like I'm claiming that we are the same online as offline.
...
Do I "avoid" speaking to you? No, not completely or for a specific reason. I'm pretty sure I have conversed with you before on non-argumentative matters. That rules out that I "avoid." However, I do admit that I don't quote you that often. I do read many of your posts though, and I do pick up some usefull things along the way (as I do with others), but there's just too much garbage I have to go through. In arguments, you drift off on tangents too often and your childish insults overshadow the "useful" in your posts. That's one of the reasons why you get into so many little petty bickers, with so many people, that usually go way beyond the main argument. Though I have to admit, I enjoy having you here because you keep the interesting posters like Sergio and Pado here. Don't worry though, you still get more attention from me than what people like Burke get from me.
As for the "swooping in," I don't see it that wa. More like I only feel the need to quote you when your posts surpass a certain level of disrespectfulness and/or BS. the level is pretty far away too BTW.
This is actually my favorite quote from your post. I'll also be happy to try my best to apply this on one condition; That you apply it first.
When "Buffon's ass" fans talk about him, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When a person in your thread makes a joke that you saw as childish, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When I QUESTION somebody's actions, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Vit kindly asks you to spell her nickname correctly, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Emma makes a joke, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Pado says "wank," either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
Now that you're looking at it this way, you'll notice how impossable it is, how dumb it is, or even how it can be applied from different perspectives.
These are forums. Your word isn't the final word and niether is mine. That's what we're here to argue about. Now, if you can quit zig-zaging around arguments, we can actually get somewhere where we either begin to see the other's point or just draw the line and say, well, that's your POV, and this is MINE. .. Sayonara.
.....
Now for the underlined part. My problem with your post above to Vit is that it was disrespectful. From her response, I think i'm right on this. Now you say that people come here to "let go." Well, I think Vit was doing just that. Many members do just that. Yet, your disrespectful "letting go" disrupts their "letting go." What's ironic too is that one of my "letting go's" is to get into constructive arguments. If this one stays on a good path, then I'm letting go. Maybe not the same fun as Pado wanking into a shoe, but it keeps me entertained. You have not failed me here. So, who's "letting go" matters most to me? I'll leave the rest to you.
5 degree. Congratualtions. I'm not that surprised. First of all, I don't think your a dumbass. I never said that or even implied it. I also don't see how being offensive relates to being stupid.
Like I said, I can't make certain claims about how a person really is, but I can QUESTION or make educated guesses based on my time here, the stuff people say about themselves and how they say things. It's not precise rocket science, but it intrigues me.
These things aren't static. It really depends on the person. I laugh when I see that something is funny. I ignore when there's no point in replying (doesn't have much to do with being "bothered" by it IMO).
and now for the begining of your post..
Maybe you should have read what I said. Better yet, maybe you should also start UNDERSTANDING what people are telling you. Why stop there? You could also, once in a blue moon, try to APPLY what people are telling you. Even best, APPLY what YOU PREACH.
You are welcome. Also, thank you for not zig-zaging too much in this post. Good job.
..............
From your other post
No thanks... I'll reply here.
1. You could have replied by PM yet you didn't.
2. People don't have to be "dragged." They could just scroll down. Meaning, the only person who might get borred is you. If I PM you, that won't prevent you from getting borred. So, I replied here. It's more fun for me too. Also, your assurtion that it's borring to everyone may not be %100 correct. Someone might catch a glimps and be amused and he/she'll read on some more.
Your statement, in bold, above isn't %100 true (or actually, what you were trying to say isn't %100 true... You mean "offline" instead of the last "online"). Funny how your telling Vit to be concise when your statements don't even make sense. I usually let these mistakes slide because I understand them (or at least make an attempt to), but you didn't with hers. Take note.
Back to the argument. While our representatives here in the forums are not identical to who we may be "offline," you have to admit that there is some common ground. Sorry, but your example about Pado and Sergio is pure non-sense and shallow. They do it to joke around. You joke around too. I joke around. Nothing wrong with that. However, it's not hard to see beynd the obvious jokes and conversations. I sense that you are referring specifically to the Vinman issue. I'll assume so. I stand by what I have said regarding that issue. How he reacts indeed makes me QUESTION his reactions in the real world. I did nothing more than QUESTION because it IS possible. In short, I disagree with your statement but I also add that there's no way for me to know. The way you made that statement makes it sound like I'm claiming that we are the same online as offline.
...
Do I "avoid" speaking to you? No, not completely or for a specific reason. I'm pretty sure I have conversed with you before on non-argumentative matters. That rules out that I "avoid." However, I do admit that I don't quote you that often. I do read many of your posts though, and I do pick up some usefull things along the way (as I do with others), but there's just too much garbage I have to go through. In arguments, you drift off on tangents too often and your childish insults overshadow the "useful" in your posts. That's one of the reasons why you get into so many little petty bickers, with so many people, that usually go way beyond the main argument. Though I have to admit, I enjoy having you here because you keep the interesting posters like Sergio and Pado here. Don't worry though, you still get more attention from me than what people like Burke get from me.
As for the "swooping in," I don't see it that wa. More like I only feel the need to quote you when your posts surpass a certain level of disrespectfulness and/or BS. the level is pretty far away too BTW.
This is actually my favorite quote from your post. I'll also be happy to try my best to apply this on one condition; That you apply it first.
When "Buffon's ass" fans talk about him, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When a person in your thread makes a joke that you saw as childish, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When I QUESTION somebody's actions, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Vit kindly asks you to spell her nickname correctly, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Emma makes a joke, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Pado says "wank," either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
Now that you're looking at it this way, you'll notice how impossable it is, how dumb it is, or even how it can be applied from different perspectives.
These are forums. Your word isn't the final word and niether is mine. That's what we're here to argue about. Now, if you can quit zig-zaging around arguments, we can actually get somewhere where we either begin to see the other's point or just draw the line and say, well, that's your POV, and this is MINE. .. Sayonara.
.....
Now for the underlined part. My problem with your post above to Vit is that it was disrespectful. From her response, I think i'm right on this. Now you say that people come here to "let go." Well, I think Vit was doing just that. Many members do just that. Yet, your disrespectful "letting go" disrupts their "letting go." What's ironic too is that one of my "letting go's" is to get into constructive arguments. If this one stays on a good path, then I'm letting go. Maybe not the same fun as Pado wanking into a shoe, but it keeps me entertained. You have not failed me here. So, who's "letting go" matters most to me? I'll leave the rest to you.
5 degree. Congratualtions. I'm not that surprised. First of all, I don't think your a dumbass. I never said that or even implied it. I also don't see how being offensive relates to being stupid.
Like I said, I can't make certain claims about how a person really is, but I can QUESTION or make educated guesses based on my time here, the stuff people say about themselves and how they say things. It's not precise rocket science, but it intrigues me.
These things aren't static. It really depends on the person. I laugh when I see that something is funny. I ignore when there's no point in replying (doesn't have much to do with being "bothered" by it IMO).
and now for the begining of your post..
Maybe you should have read what I said. Better yet, maybe you should also start UNDERSTANDING what people are telling you. Why stop there? You could also, once in a blue moon, try to APPLY what people are telling you. Even best, APPLY what YOU PREACH.
You are welcome. Also, thank you for not zig-zaging too much in this post. Good job.
..............
From your other post
No thanks... I'll reply here.
1. You could have replied by PM yet you didn't.
2. People don't have to be "dragged." They could just scroll down. Meaning, the only person who might get borred is you. If I PM you, that won't prevent you from getting borred. So, I replied here. It's more fun for me too. Also, your assurtion that it's borring to everyone may not be %100 correct. Someone might catch a glimps and be amused and he/she'll read on some more.
OP
To save a few lives (and avoid people from shooting themselves in the head) I will save what I have to say to Majed by three words:
GET A LIFE.
Sorry Chief but I'll admit once again I didn't read your post because I could pretty much tell you what it says without needing to read it...the sheer size pretty much gives me an idea of what "goodwill" stuff you are slanging again. Put your energy and time to more constructive things...like dates, education or volunteer work.
MORE IMPORTANTLY, while you have to the freedom to do what you want I would really urge you to only post in NICK AGAINST THE WORLD if you are going to 'be creative'...if you feel the need the dish out the "SPEECH" again...save it...for my sake....for all our sakes...life is too short to get his serious over an internet board.
GET A LIFE.
Sorry Chief but I'll admit once again I didn't read your post because I could pretty much tell you what it says without needing to read it...the sheer size pretty much gives me an idea of what "goodwill" stuff you are slanging again. Put your energy and time to more constructive things...like dates, education or volunteer work.
MORE IMPORTANTLY, while you have to the freedom to do what you want I would really urge you to only post in NICK AGAINST THE WORLD if you are going to 'be creative'...if you feel the need the dish out the "SPEECH" again...save it...for my sake....for all our sakes...life is too short to get his serious over an internet board.
sigh...
Your complete lack of understanding of everything I said makes me helpless, so for last time, like to a child:
I meant here, that you've never sent me any PM, so I have no idea, what you're talking about.
You sent me an email.
You feel free to give advices to the others, so accept advices from them too; this is one from me: learn to read and understand other people.
I will try to put this as simple as possible, without being disrespectful-
Majed, you dont know me, dont know what I deal with on a daily basis, as a matter of fact, you couldnt imagine what I go thru on a daily basis, so I am asking you to please leave my occupation and personal life out of this forum.
I really dont care for your concern of how I treat people on my job. I have 8 years of serving my community without any marks against my record. I dont come here to toot my own horn, but as long as you bring this subject up, I have had nothing but commendations from the 2 departments I've worked for in my career.
Have I gotten a little animated here ?? yes I have, but its mainly because I'm so RESERVE in my real life, with my job and family....
Some ppl I work with vent by drinking. Others by over-eating
I vent by playing soccer, and coming here to let off some steam......
Majed, you dont know me, dont know what I deal with on a daily basis, as a matter of fact, you couldnt imagine what I go thru on a daily basis, so I am asking you to please leave my occupation and personal life out of this forum.
I really dont care for your concern of how I treat people on my job. I have 8 years of serving my community without any marks against my record. I dont come here to toot my own horn, but as long as you bring this subject up, I have had nothing but commendations from the 2 departments I've worked for in my career.
Have I gotten a little animated here ?? yes I have, but its mainly because I'm so RESERVE in my real life, with my job and family....
Some ppl I work with vent by drinking. Others by over-eating
I vent by playing soccer, and coming here to let off some steam......
Very well.. I had already stated that I wouldn't say anymore about you. My post here was merely repatition of what i said in response to Nick.
While I still reserve my right to QUESTION, thank you Vinman for removing all doubt. Sergio and others have had nothing but good words for you for how you really are and that's enough for me.
I've always said this Vinman, you're in a well respected job that we're (that includes me) greatful for. Keep it up! I have no intention of putting you down.
I have said enough above regarding "letting off steam" so I don't need to add anything more.
Thank you for responding respectfully.
While I still reserve my right to QUESTION, thank you Vinman for removing all doubt. Sergio and others have had nothing but good words for you for how you really are and that's enough for me.
I've always said this Vinman, you're in a well respected job that we're (that includes me) greatful for. Keep it up! I have no intention of putting you down.
I have said enough above regarding "letting off steam" so I don't need to add anything more.
Thank you for responding respectfully.
- Status