++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
An individual's traits and morales on-line is not indicative of his morals and values on-line. People come here to let go and thus the term "free time". You seem to have a knack to avoid speaking to me for weeks and like a vulture swoop down to give me the "be a better Mormon" speech. Padovano speaks of wanking and women's shoes yet he pleads before a Judge most days. Sergio goes on about porn and drugs 24/7 yet is the most loyal husband and 'stand up person' here. You don't know me..I don't know you.
While this wasn't my reason for replying to your post to Vit, I'll give you my $0.02.
Your statement, in bold, above isn't %100 true (or actually, what you were trying to say isn't %100 true... You mean "offline" instead of the last "online"). Funny how your telling Vit to be concise when your statements don't even make sense. I usually let these mistakes slide because I understand them (or at least make an attempt to), but you didn't with hers. Take note.
Back to the argument. While our representatives here in the forums are not identical to who we may be "offline," you have to admit that there is some common ground. Sorry, but your example about Pado and Sergio is pure non-sense and shallow. They do it to joke around. You joke around too. I joke around. Nothing wrong with that. However, it's not hard to see beynd the obvious jokes and conversations. I sense that you are referring specifically to the Vinman issue. I'll assume so. I stand by what I have said regarding that issue. How he reacts indeed makes me QUESTION his reactions in the real world. I did nothing more than QUESTION because it IS possible. In short, I disagree with your statement but I also add that there's no way for me to know. The way you made that statement makes it sound like I'm claiming that we are the same online as offline.
...
Do I "avoid" speaking to you? No, not completely or for a specific reason. I'm pretty sure I have conversed with you before on non-argumentative matters. That rules out that I "avoid." However, I do admit that I don't quote you that often. I do read many of your posts though, and I do pick up some usefull things along the way (as I do with others), but there's just too much garbage I have to go through. In arguments, you drift off on tangents too often and your childish insults overshadow the "useful" in your posts. That's one of the reasons why you get into so many little petty bickers, with so many people, that usually go way beyond the main argument. Though I have to admit, I enjoy having you here because you keep the interesting posters like Sergio and Pado here. Don't worry though, you still get more attention from me than what people like Burke get from me.
As for the "swooping in," I don't see it that wa. More like I only feel the need to quote you when your posts surpass a certain level of disrespectfulness and/or BS. the level is pretty far away too BTW.
So whatever sh*t I throw here ... either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON. Thats all I need to tell you.
This is actually my favorite quote from your post. I'll also be happy to try my best to apply this on one condition; That you apply it first.
When "Buffon's ass" fans talk about him, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When a person in your thread makes a joke that you saw as childish, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When I QUESTION somebody's actions, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Vit kindly asks you to spell her nickname correctly, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Emma makes a joke, either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
When Pado says "wank," either laugh at it..swallow it or JOG ON.
Now that you're looking at it this way, you'll notice how impossable it is, how dumb it is, or even how it can be applied from different perspectives.
These are forums. Your word isn't the final word and niether is mine. That's what we're here to argue about. Now, if you can quit zig-zaging around arguments, we can actually get somewhere where we either begin to see the other's point or just draw the line and say, well, that's your POV, and this is MINE. .. Sayonara.
.....
Now for the underlined part. My problem with your post above to Vit is that it was disrespectful. From her response, I think i'm right on this. Now you say that people come here to "let go." Well, I think Vit was doing just that. Many members do just that. Yet, your disrespectful "letting go" disrupts their "letting go." What's ironic too is that one of my "letting go's" is to get into constructive arguments. If this one stays on a good path, then I'm letting go. Maybe not the same fun as Pado wanking into a shoe, but it keeps me entertained. You have not failed me here. So, who's "letting go" matters most to me? I'll leave the rest to you.
If I wanted a lecture or a scolding I would have gone back to school for a 5th degree (imagine that..this dumbass GUIDO has 4 degrees....hard to tell from his jack ass personality on-line right).
5 degree. Congratualtions. I'm not that surprised. First of all, I don't think your a dumbass. I never said that or even implied it. I also don't see how being offensive relates to being stupid.
Like I said, I can't make certain claims about how a person really is, but I can QUESTION or make educated guesses based on my time here, the stuff people say about themselves and how they say things. It's not precise rocket science, but it intrigues me.
KNOW when to let go...when to laugh and when to ignore the post if it bothers you.
These things aren't static. It really depends on the person. I laugh when I see that something is funny. I ignore when there's no point in replying (doesn't have much to do with being "bothered" by it IMO).
and now for the begining of your post..
I'll be honest..I didn't read your post but I could pretty much guess what you said and there is something I have wanted to tell you for a long time because you just like my old broken happy days record keep skipping on the part I hated most (These days are ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh)
Maybe you should have read what I said. Better yet, maybe you should also start UNDERSTANDING what people are telling you. Why stop there? You could also, once in a blue moon, try to APPLY what people are telling you. Even best, APPLY what YOU PREACH.
You are welcome. Also, thank you for not zig-zaging too much in this post. Good job.
..............
From your other post
NOTE TO MAJED: If you feel the need to point out my EVIL WAYS once again and drag everyone through that long boring draining shot-us-in the head B.S. PM me dude. The forum is getting BORING ENOUGH.
No thanks... I'll reply here.
1. You could have replied by PM yet you didn't.
2. People don't have to be "dragged." They could just scroll down. Meaning, the only person who might get borred is you. If I PM you, that won't prevent you from getting borred. So, I replied here. It's more fun for me too. Also, your assurtion that it's borring to everyone may not be %100 correct. Someone might catch a glimps and be amused and he/she'll read on some more.