I did not support Jadid, but he seemed a good guy relatively to Al-Asad who did nothing on all sectors.
I would understand if he gave up Golan in order to deploy his resources to make a manufacturing, agricultural, infrastructure development in his country. But in fact, he did nothing. His only concern was to stay the president and to inherit the presidency to his son as if Syria is his own farm.
You know Refaat could not do that alone. No? And who brought Refaat in the first place to politics?
Ok. Forget about that. What about his destroying to Tal Al-Zaatar camp in Lebanon?
What about occupying Lebanon for more than 20 years?
What about being the first Arab president to inherit presidency to his son?
I would understand if he gave up Golan in order to deploy his resources to make a manufacturing, agricultural, infrastructure development in his country. But in fact, he did nothing. His only concern was to stay the president and to inherit the presidency to his son as if Syria is his own farm.
You know Refaat could not do that alone. No? And who brought Refaat in the first place to politics?
Ok. Forget about that. What about his destroying to Tal Al-Zaatar camp in Lebanon?
What about occupying Lebanon for more than 20 years?
What about being the first Arab president to inherit presidency to his son?
Although he brought his brother Refaat to politics, he exiled him after what happened in Hamah and Damascus! (Did you watch Refaat through his own TV station when Hafez passed away?)...
And you are talking about occupying Lebanon? I admit the Syrian army did many horrible things there, but there was a civil war in Lebanon and Syrians were asked to intervene! they did bad things there but they also stopped a really ugly civil war...
About the Tal Al-Zaatar incident, I really don't know anything about it...
