Non-Juve Transfer news (official or rumors) (81 Viewers)

[Bezzy]

Why then was Marchisio playing out of position on the left for the whole season?

Because both Melo and Aquilani were better/more efficient.

or were even more horrible lw as marchisio

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[swag]

I agree ... the terms of the deal make it easier to digest, though, especially if he isn't the only new player coming in, as it seems.

A serious terms downgrade from the Juve terms, that's for sure. Liverpool raped Juve by comparison for him.

 

[Trequartista]

or were even more horrible lw as marchisio

Why was Marchisio playing on the left??

Simple, Aquilani is a better CM.

Aquilani is a good player, he'll do well for Milan.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

A serious terms downgrade from the Juve terms, that's for sure. Liverpool raped Juve by comparison for him.

and nobody is surprised, and thats really alarming, we have come to expect and be ok with it

 

[Enron]

A serious terms downgrade from the Juve terms, that's for sure. Liverpool raped Juve by comparison for him.

How much did Juve's rental cost?

 

[acmilan]

You gays call Marchisio invisible? This is the really invisible one. Tiago v 2.0.

wouldn't go this far, even though I am not a fan of this Aquaman to Milan deal ... getting the Aquilani at Juve makes me wanna cry but being at Milan could work out differently for him considering he will find a diff environment there, nothing like the one del Neri created at Juve last season.
Will have to wait and see how this one ends.

-----

anyways, more and more info is squeezing thru about Kaka to Milan being a matter of details - seems he will be back to Milan, on a loan deal, with Milan paying about 60% of his salary.

 

[acmilan]

How much did Juve's rental cost?

not sure but I think it was a free loan with the right to buy him for 16 mil, iirc, and Juve paying his entire salary of 4 mil from his contract with 'Pool

 

[X Æ A-12]

or were even more horrible lw as marchisio

Nah they just both did better in the center than him.

 

[Enron]

not sure but I think it was a free loan with the right to buy him for 16 mil, iirc, and Juve paying his entire salary of 4 mil from his contract with 'Pool

That's what I thought.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

granted the 'terms' were different last year, but i am pretty sure had we approached them this year we would never get that sort of deal

 

[swag]

How much did Juve's rental cost?

I believe it was a free loan. Which isn't a terrible deal. But then Liverpool wasn't exactly paying part of his wages either.

 

[Bezzy]

Nah they just both did better in the center than him.

no they didn't
because the both had to leave of conte

 

[Trequartista]

no they didn't
because the both had to leave of conte

Are you actually saying that Marchisio did better in midfield than Aquilani and Melo??

Laughable, really.

 

[X Æ A-12]

no they didn't
because the both had to leave of conte

Melo left because of problems with the board off the pitch and Aquilani's loan was up. Nothing more to it.

Only reason we didn't keep Aquilani was signing Pirlo required us to go after a DM instead (and he wasn't available for 6m at the time)

 

[acmilan]

A serious terms downgrade from the Juve terms, that's for sure. Liverpool raped Juve by comparison for him.

it seems 'Pool have a weired contrcat with Roma for him in the sense that if he stays there and play for them, they'd have to pay millions to Roma as part of that deal. So, all in all, they were forced to ship him out ... and his lackluster season with Juve, along with the transfer period running out, didn't help 'pool's case and played right into Galliani's hands

 

[Trequartista]

it seems 'Pool have a weired contrcat with Roma for him in the sense that if he stays there and play for them, they'd have to pay millions to Roma as part of that deal. So, all in all, they were forced to ship him out ... and his lackluster season with Juve, along with the transfer period running out, didn't help 'pool's case and played right into Galliani's hands

Galliano is a good director, you guys are lucky to have him.

 

[acmilan]

Galliano is a good director, you guys are lucky to have him.

he is a great GM with his only flaw being that he tends to let his personal feelings towards Milan players get the better of him come conract extension season.
If he was as ruthless as Moggi was, Galliani would have been virtually perfect in my eyes

 

[Bezzy]

Are you actually saying that Marchisio did better in midfield than Aquilani and Melo??

Laughable, really.

no i said they are even more horrible as lw then marchi

 

[radekas]

The fact is. We changed Aquilani and Melo for Vidal and Pirlo. IMO that's a significant upgrade. I'm not adding Sissoko and Piazenza as they are equally useless bench players, propably.

 

[Trequartista]

no i said they are even more horrible as lw then marchi

Why would this matter?? They are not LWs.

Actually, they didn't need to play LW as they were good enough to play CM in a 4-4-2.

I am sorry to say this but you are probably the most clueless poster on this forum and should stick to the picture thread like Katiedifran.