Well, that's to be judged individually by his medical staff who have actual information about his health instead of guessing.
But I'd normally say 1 year after his return to sports the niggling injuries should lessen/stop. So yeah, it's hugely exaggerated since this is just the normal course of things. There will always be exceptions in either direction but they're just that; exceptions.
What's the reasoning; why would he have a variety of minor injuries, lack of continuity and pain? It's easy to suggest that but why? Because that's not how it works... There are objective tests for that and it's all part of the medical screenings.
I'm still very curious to know what might it be that in your view would not be labelled as exaggerated concerns or doubts about someone's fitness , what type of repetitive injuries or situations would you deem as actually warranting such excessive concerns? Taking everything that i listed in my previous posts into account ofc.
If 2 ACL injuries in two years followed by other repetitive minor muscular ones is not reason enough for concerns and huge question marks than i guess nothing will ever be and injury history should count for nothing after all.
- - - Updated - - -
Look, just to clarify my position on this... Zaniolo coming here as a market opportunity for under €20M or for free would surely be a gamble worth taking, anything more is just too much given the risks that come with it, we lack leaders on the pitch, we need players that are fully fit and not afraid to go into challenges, players with continuity and immediate impact, something that we have been lacking lately... we probably got the worst injury record among all top teams and i find it really hard to believe that our solution to that while having a limited budget is to spend over €40M on another player that could just as easily end up spending more time in JMedical than on the pitch, or even worst will just not be able to replicate the form or find any continuity due to not being 100% fit all the time.