Nicolò Fagioli (56 Viewers)

Firestarter

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
Jul 15, 2006
25,579
We lost only 1 match this season, but with him on the pitch it would have been 4 defeats.

1. Juve-Stuttgart 0:1 (played full match)
2. Inter-Juve 4:4 (we were losing 2:4 when he was replaced)
3. Juve-Cagliari 1:1 (we were winning 1:0 when he was subbed in)
4. Juve-PSV 3:1 (we were winning 3:0 when he was subbed in, and then PSV scored)

Liability!

Danilo and Weah are the other two with a similar record.
exactly we suffer as a team when he plays. @Bjerknes will also attest to this now
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,859
We lost only 1 match this season, but with him on the pitch it would have been 4 defeats.

1. Juve-Stuttgart 0:1 (played full match)
2. Inter-Juve 4:4 (we were losing 2:4 when he was replaced)
3. Juve-Cagliari 1:1 (we were winning 1:0 when he was subbed in)
4. Juve-PSV 3:1 (we were winning 3:0 when he was subbed in, and then PSV scored)

Liability!

Danilo and Weah are the other two with a similar record.
That has to be the cherry picked stat of October, well done. Fags is almost right in the middle of +/- per 90, but I assume you knew that given how weird you phrased this.

1730099858361.png
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,925
That has to be the cherry picked stat of October, well done.
Here's another one.
Juventus are conceding a goal in 120 minutes this season. With Fagioli on, we concede 1 in 70. As a matter of fact, he played 636 minutes in which we conceded 9 goals. In the 444 minutes that he didn't play, we didn't concede a single goal.
His presence makes the defense vulnerable.

And another one.
Juve are scoring a goal in 51 minutes. With Fagioli on, we score 1 in 83 minutes.
His presence makes the attack much less lethal.

LiaFUCKINbility!
 

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,859
Here's another one.
Juventus are conceding a goal in 120 minutes this season. With Fagioli on, we concede 1 in 70. As a matter of fact, he played 636 minutes in which we conceded 9 goals. In the 444 minutes that he didn't play, we didn't concede a single goal.
His presence makes the defense vulnerable.

And another one.
Juve are scoring a goal in 51 minutes. With Fagioli on, we score 1 in 83 minutes.
His presence makes the attack much less lethal.

LiaFUCKINbility!
huh, I had filtered only Serie A. his CL stats are bad indeed. not as bad as Jonas Rouhi, but bad.

1730101651294.png
 

Attachments

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,607
huh, I had filtered only Serie A. his CL stats are bad indeed. not as bad as Jonas Rouhi, but bad.

1730101651294.png
fagioli was one of our best players in leipzig, that's what distorts his otherwise spotlessly mediocre season. i like him as a player but he shouldn't play as a starter in this form, especially not twice per week. he got ran over by both stuttgart and inda midfields, and barella even had a shit game yesterday to make it easier for our central players

btw look at locatelli and gatti, and compare it with thuram and danilo. sometimes stats give you a good reflection of reality

anyway, we're missing 3 players badly: bremer, koopmeiners and a vice vlahovic
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,328
Here's another one.
Juventus are conceding a goal in 120 minutes this season. With Fagioli on, we concede 1 in 70. As a matter of fact, he played 636 minutes in which we conceded 9 goals. In the 444 minutes that he didn't play, we didn't concede a single goal.
His presence makes the defense vulnerable.

And another one.
Juve are scoring a goal in 51 minutes. With Fagioli on, we score 1 in 83 minutes.
His presence makes the attack much less lethal.

LiaFUCKINbility!
I'm glad for these stats.

Sometimes we let the fact he is a reprehensible human being cloud our judgment. It's hard to see whether we think of Fagioli as someone who is not good enough for Juventus because he does not have the required talent or because he's morally bankrupt.

The stats show that - his lack of ethics aside - he's also a poor player.
 

GrandeGigi

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2012
1,884
fagioli was one of our best players in leipzig, that's what distorts his otherwise spotlessly mediocre season. i like him as a player but he shouldn't play as a starter in this form, especially not twice per week. he got ran over by both stuttgart and inda midfields, and barella even had a shit game yesterday to make it easier for our central players

btw look at locatelli and gatti, and compare it with thuram and danilo. sometimes stats give you a good reflection of reality

anyway, we're missing 3 players badly: bremer, koopmeiners and a vice vlahovic
This is spot on. The biggest issue with him appears to be when he’s not contributing well with the ball like he did in that one game, he’s a net negative because he gets played around too easily, get in wrong positions and offers little without the ball. His ceiling may well be as a rotational piece as a 5th or 6th midfielder.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,328
This is spot on. The biggest issue with him appears to be when he’s not contributing well with the ball like he did in that one game, he’s a net negative because he gets played around too easily, get in wrong positions and offers little without the ball. His ceiling may well be as a rotational piece as a 5th or 6th midfielder.
I struggle to see what he adds as a rotation player.

He doesn't score, he doesn't assist. He doesn't invent plays. But then he doesn't fight either. In the past you had someone like Sturaro. His level was, at best, a fourth string midfielder for us. But he gave his all when he came on and through sheer physicality he actually ended up being useful on a handful of occasions.

Fagioli doesn't offer anything similar. Either we get a fourth string midfielder with some semblance of creativity. Or we get a warrior. I don't particularly care which guy we go for. But I don't think there is any scenario in which Fagioli is a useful sub.
 

GrandeGigi

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2012
1,884
I struggle to see what he adds as a rotation player.

He doesn't score, he doesn't assist. He doesn't invent plays. But then he doesn't fight either. In the past you had someone like Sturaro. His level was, at best, a fourth string midfielder for us. But he gave his all when he came on and through sheer physicality he actually ended up being useful on a handful of occasions.

Fagioli doesn't offer anything similar. Either we get a fourth string midfielder with some semblance of creativity. Or we get a warrior. I don't particularly care which guy we go for. But I don't think there is any scenario in which Fagioli is a useful sub.
His creativity isn’t bad by current Serie A standards so that’s the only role he can try to fill as I think he will always be a defensively liability to some extent.

I think he has a use against the mid to lower table sides that bunker in and offer little offensively, but as you say clearly needs to improve his end product as it has been poor thus far. From what we’ve seen he will at least try and get the ball to make things happen, whilst being different in that regard to our current complement of Wes, Locatelli and Thuram.

His playstyle is also suited to the current coach who wants to play possession football at all costs, unlike his predecessors for whom a Sturaro or Padoin type was far more important.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,607
This is spot on. The biggest issue with him appears to be when he’s not contributing well with the ball like he did in that one game, he’s a net negative because he gets played around too easily, get in wrong positions and offers little without the ball. His ceiling may well be as a rotational piece as a 5th or 6th midfielder.
not sure about the potential. a player who can pass like fagioli is hard to find. he's not a bad player by any means, he's useful in getting the ball forward, he's effective in creating shots from both open play and dead ball situations. even motta's tactics help him too: as you mentioned, without the ball he's not effective, and fortunately for him, we have the ball more than last seasons

too bad he's just a soft player physically - and probably mentally too. if he had a buid like locatelli, let alone thuram, he'd be an easy starter. and there's his mentality too: he should work twice as hard as anyone else to show some gratitude towards the club, and he's not quicker, he's not stronger, he's got no more grinta than last season or before. he didn't improve one bit basically. i just don't see him as an extra motivated player which should be the bare minimum from him after how the club handled his gambling addiction with the new contract and that fucking raise. this club most probably saved his life, he should drink blood before all games
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,328
not sure about the potential. a player who can pass like fagioli is hard to find. he's not a bad player by any means, he's useful in getting the ball forward, he's effective in creating shots from both open play and dead ball situations. even motta's tactics help him too: as you mentioned, without the ball he's not effective, and fortunately for him, we have the ball more than last seasons

too bad he's just a soft player physically - and probably mentally too. if he had a buid like locatelli, let alone thuram, he'd be an easy starter. and there's his mentality too: he should work twice as hard as anyone else to show some gratitude towards the club, and he's not quicker, he's not stronger, he's got no more grinta than last season or before. he didn't improve one bit basically. i just don't see him as an extra motivated player which should be the bare minimum from him after how the club handled his gambling addiction with the new contract and that fucking raise. this club most probably saved his life, he should drink blood before all games
That's not how the brain of a parasite works.
 

Adrian

Senior Member
Jan 31, 2003
6,872
Im on the fence with him...definitely hasnt lot the world on fire but i see some potential. Still dont know his best position or how he fits in this team. Then again, indont even know how this team works..it is a bit of a shitshow at the moment.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,987
homeboy is what? 24 now? When does the "potential" so many see in him have to become more than that?
If you look at players like Zaire-Emery, Bernal, or Pedri, Fagioli is basically retired now. It's time to move on.

Only cuz they can’t blame Mckennie today…or Weah.
Correct. One of them make a bad pass and it's all hell broken loose in their threads. They even had to be bumped today because it was so quiet in there.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 44)