Nick Against the World (87 Viewers)

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,789
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++

Not at all... I said he didnt exist in a pure sense... as such he didnt die in his humanity... As such not truely a religious discussion... though i have no idea why you run from such things,,, discussion is healthy...

Anyway, as you clearly find it uncomfortable, i will leave off of this road for now...

I'll leave you with a little piece to see what im talking about though...

http://www.juventuz.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=599896&highlight=jesus#post599896

Enjoy.... Time for dinner...

We will unless it bothers you, continue this later... Its upto you
I also had some reserves on omitting Suetonius and his life of the caesars his name was only mentioned while his work is critical in the field.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
++ [ originally posted by Tifoso Lou ] ++


The God of the OT (though, of couse he's God of the NT, too) was dealing with a stiff necked people who didn't understand anything else (I am not slamming the Jews, whom I consider my elder brothers in the faith--the non Jews of the time were sacrificing their children, for example).
Jesus came to fulfill the OT, not replace it (which is why the 10 Commandments still hold).

It makes all the difference in the world.
It makes no difference at all....

So your saying the Murder of millions of people is fine, because they were stubborn and didnt understand... What bollocks... That means half the planet should be killed off...

Your also saying that this all powerful God, the worlds creator.... Was incapable of teaching these people and completely intolerent of anyone / thing that didnt agree with him....

Get real,
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
++ [ originally posted by Tifoso Lou ] ++


Paul, I am not qualified to answer your statements in the hyperlink. I know that they are mistaken, but I have neither the time nor the resources to argue with you.
Sorry, but they arent, you could spend your life dedicated to disproving that article (you do realise that was only a tiny excerpt of a much more indepth piece) and you never would do more than question a couple of little bits.... People have tried and cant...

Fact : No historian has ever found any proof to the existence of Jesus Christ

That is a fact,

Not one single recognised historian or religious "qwan" has ever managed to supply even a shred of evidence...

I only will add that carbon dating is notoriously inaccurate and that the Shroud's authenticity has no bearing whatsoever on Jesus' authenticity (if you will).
Why do people do that ? Is it really so damn hard to read what is before you... Where in the world does it say the authenticity of the shroud has any bearing on the existence of jesus ??

Oh yes... it doesnt....
If you read it you would know that the bit i wrote about the shroud was in answer to a previous question and definately was not used in relation to the existence of jesus...

As for carbon dating.... PLease get a grip... it doesnt need to be accurate... the dating of the shroud, even within accepted tolerances of the carbon process is so far out its questionabilty is redundant...

The shroud is confirmed to date between 1260-1390... Whatever you want to say about the dating process... The idea that it can be 1300 0dd years out is completely ridiculous...


Find the nearest Christian University and sit down with a scholar. It will be worth the time.
See again you make your little assumptions about people... You have no idea how far i've looked into this, yet you assume as i dont agree with you... That i havent...

Sorry i dont work like that... If im discussing a subject like this with you in this place... its purely because Ive spent time on it...
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
++ [ originally posted by Altair ] ++


Not to to intrude on your discussion but to bring the existence of a historical Jesus into question is simply ridiculous. As for the arguments brought on that link they seem at best sketchy and with the case of noncanonical sources such as Tacitus complete garbage. I suggest you re-read the passage on how tacitus' accounts were dismissed and count the number of contradictions festering in said argument. Moreover a simple projection of statistics makes it impossible for accounts from different distant locales to weave such complex description with a high degree of similarity. Finally and really the most obvious element of it all, what is the motive behind such alleged chimera ? and as with any protest it is imperative for that motive to be more convincing and simpler in design than its counter, of course.
See here we go again... Another who doesnt actually read what is before them but deems to comment.... Its part of an article, put there merely to point something out... If people were interested they would have looked into it and seen more....


The facts are.. whether you like it or not... Not one single person anywhere in this world has ever even come close to proving the existence of jesus ...

That is a fact... Its a fact accepted by the worlds religious leaders, by the worlds most recognised historians... It is also a point that has absolutely no bearing on faith or the teachings of christianity itself... If you think it does , you are jus showing you have zero understanding of what the bible is about....
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
++ [ originally posted by Altair ] ++


I also had some reserves on omitting Suetonius and his life of the caesars his name was only mentioned while his work is critical in the field.
You had reserves ?

Did you write it ?

Do you know where that came from, what it was part of ?

Of course you didnt...


But i digress... DIsprove it ?

Show the evidence...

Dont care how you do it...

Show evidence of his existence directly or jus prove the falicy of every part of even that small excerpt of an article...

Go ahead... No one in history has ever done it... So go for it...

If you can you will be the most recognised man in the world within weeks... a multi millionaire and a global hero...

Please show us...

But no... you wont, and you'll throw little excuses as to why, but fact is you wont because it cant be done .... never has been and never will be... Some of the greatest minds this world has ever seen have dedicated their lives to proving his existence and failed...
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,789
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++


See here we go again... Another who doesnt actually read what is before them but deems to comment.... Its part of an article, put there merely to point something out... If people were interested they would have looked into it and seen more....


The facts are.. whether you like it or not... Not one single person anywhere in this world has ever even come close to proving the existence of jesus ...

That is a fact... Its a fact accepted by the worlds religious leaders, by the worlds most recognised historians... It is also a point that has absolutely no bearing on faith or the teachings of christianity itself... If you think it does , you are jus showing you have zero understanding of what the bible is about....

If there's one who doesnt read other's comment out of pedantry it certainly is you. Which authority are you to say what is fact and isnt. What you call fact is your mere obstinacy to shed all presented with your "belief" dye. Moreover your quick to assume(and again because you didnt read) that I am christian and my objection therein stems; again wrong. All i had talked about was scholarly. I suggested you either answer arguments presented or admit to merely opining on the subject.

N.B: "fact accepted by the worlds religious leaders, by the worlds most recognised historians" gimme a break I really expected a bit more elan in your replies what a disappointment
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,789
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++


You had reserves ?

Did you write it ?

Do you know where that came from, what it was part of ?

Of course you didnt...


But i digress... DIsprove it ?

Show the evidence...

Dont care how you do it...

Show evidence of his existence directly or jus prove the falicy of every part of even that small excerpt of an article...

Go ahead... No one in history has ever done it... So go for it...

If you can you will be the most recognised man in the world within weeks... a multi millionaire and a global hero...

Please show us...

But no... you wont, and you'll throw little excuses as to why, but fact is you wont because it cant be done .... never has been and never will be... Some of the greatest minds this world has ever seen have dedicated their lives to proving his existence and failed...

how long will you be answering for me. Present a complete and comprehensive injunction to prove and i'll give it my best, and please be specific, as in what do you mean by "directly" and am I to profve and disprove isnt one enough
 

Slagathor

Bedpan racing champion
Jul 25, 2001
22,708
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
Another case of why religion should not be discussed on this forum. Politics are perfectly fine once in a while, however religion is just not worth the trouble.
**** that, mate. The politics you 'discussed' with Seven 'once in a while' were completely killing this place. The disucussion between the two utmost civilised beings Lou and Shadowfax is one of the best things that have ever happened in this place in recent times. Really refreshing.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
++ [ originally posted by Tifoso Lou ] ++


Would you die on a cross for someone, if you didn't care, amico mio?

God didnt die on a cross for anyone, Jesus did. And by the Bible he is the Son of God, not God. Even if he is the Son of God is debatable, so IMO if there really is such a thing as God there is no guarantee he even cares what happenes here.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,326
++ [ originally posted by Altair ] ++


I dont give a hoot what you believe, the point is your statement is offensive plain and simple. Furthermore i never said anything about God on this forum; and had I done so and you expressed it had offended you i would have immediately retracted. Hence you're full of it. It's really simple you're kid and just like any spoiled kid out there you crave attention. Now add on to that a loser idle lifestyle and we're stuck with mal-content hooligan who cant handle the real world so he deals his pathetic angst to an internet forum.
Oh please. People who are scared and can't handle the real world are mostly those who believe in God. Fear and the need to have an explanation for the world are the only two reasons people believe in God.

And TBH I'm sick of the fact that christianity can't be discussed here.
Over 2000 years ago people had mythical societies. That means that those who had power didn't have to explain their power with rational reasons, but that they would make up a story that would have to be respected. Basically it's a vicious circle: the reason why they're in charge is their story which is made up by them.

Genesis is one of the prime examples of such a story. Why should we do this and not that? Because the Bible says so. Suddenly the Bible has become an authority. That's how they did it 2000 years ago people.

Imagine me writing a story and telling you what to do. When asked why you have to do what I tell you to do I'd answer: because my story says so.
See the logic in that?


"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
- Galileo Galilei
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,326
++ [ originally posted by snoop ] ++


Because I hear this crap all the time "where is God" "If there is a God, why he never stops the wars" etc..and this is really a good answer for that.

God gave us the freewill,he will not interfere every second we do something bad.
He could have interfered once though.

As for Lou's parents analogy:

do you let your three year old daughter cross the road by herself? God does.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
++ [ originally posted by Tifoso Lou ] ++
We are really entering a religious discussion, amico mio--which is a no-no.
Strictly, yes, but it's been done before, and I don't have any trouble with it as long as there's no name calling.

If the debate doesn't lose steam soon, I'll spin it off as a new thread.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


Oh please. People who are scared and can't handle the real world are mostly those who believe in God. Fear and the need to have an explanation for the world are the only two reasons people believe in God.
Another statement alluding to superiority by Seven. I believe in God and I'm not scared of much in this world...how can you make such a generalized statement such as that? Oh wait, I bet I know the reason..

"Can't handle the real world" why do you say that? Oh, that's right, you don't believe in God so therefore everybody else is wrong and living in some sort of fairytale land. People believe in God for different reasons, not just because they are all scared of the world or need answers for there existence...this is where faith comes in.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,326
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Another statement alluding to superiority by Seven. I believe in God and I'm not scared of much in this world...how can you make such a generalized statement such as that? Oh wait, I bet I know the reason..

"Can't handle the real world" why do you say that? Oh, that's right, you don't believe in God so therefore everybody else is wrong and living in some sort of fairytale land. People believe in God for different reasons, not just because they are all scared of the world or need answers for there existence...this is where faith comes in.
Please read my post again in an objective manner, Andy. You'll see that I didn't write what you think I did.

And I already explained what a religion basically is in the following lines.
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++


Sorry, but they arent, you could spend your life dedicated to disproving that article (you do realise that was only a tiny excerpt of a much more indepth piece) and you never would do more than question a couple of little bits.... People have tried and cant...

Fact : No historian has ever found any proof to the existence of Jesus Christ

That is a fact,

Not one single recognised historian or religious "qwan" has ever managed to supply even a shred of evidence...



Why do people do that ? Is it really so damn hard to read what is before you... Where in the world does it say the authenticity of the shroud has any bearing on the existence of jesus ??

Oh yes... it doesnt....
If you read it you would know that the bit i wrote about the shroud was in answer to a previous question and definately was not used in relation to the existence of jesus...

As for carbon dating.... PLease get a grip... it doesnt need to be accurate... the dating of the shroud, even within accepted tolerances of the carbon process is so far out its questionabilty is redundant...

The shroud is confirmed to date between 1260-1390... Whatever you want to say about the dating process... The idea that it can be 1300 0dd years out is completely ridiculous...




See again you make your little assumptions about people... You have no idea how far i've looked into this, yet you assume as i dont agree with you... That i havent...

Sorry i dont work like that... If im discussing a subject like this with you in this place... its purely because Ive spent time on it...

you sure you've looked far enough? You'd be suprised.
 

Holygr4le

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2005
2,539
Religion is created by man only cause we can´t live without answers to questions we don’t understand.

The thought that time is something that has always existed is unbearable and impossible to comprehend. Like it is impossible for a mouse to understand that cheese is made out of something from a cow.

And because we don’t understand these things we invented religion.
The Vikings explained thunder with Thor and the Romans with Jupiter and the Greeks with Zeus. Same thing different name.
As goes for protestants ore Catholics. We could not understand how life was invented, what the sun was or the fact that life has to ends when you die.

I encountered a great religion in Mongolia. 15 pages, a small book. It told you to be nice and think well about other people. Hade something similar like the 10 commandments but I believe it was 15. Told you how to help someone with different injuries and how to treat you surroundings.

-“But what do you believe in”, I asked.
-“Believe in? Just follow the book and you can believe in anything you want”.

There you have a great religion.
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
Well if all those are the reasons why man believes in a Supreme Being, than those who choose not to believe in this supreme being is because they don't give a damn. They are rebels who don't want to be ''controlled'' by anyone. Its always easy to dismiss people that have faith in the unseen.


@Seven: Parents don't let you cross the road when you're 3, you're right. But God does?

Who created the parents? I think that's why they're there ;)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 87)