++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
I can't say how the next fifteen minutes will go ... whats your point? One makes assumptions on a game based on a team's past performance as a whole. As a result, given Milan's consitency in Europe AND Serie A vis-a-vis Liverpool's 5th place in Premier and 'shockers' in Europe I think its fair to say WHO the favorite is.
Milan were never in danger of getting booted out from PSV....the scoreline was never in PSV's favor to close the game. A miracle would have had to occur..it did not.
what a shame
I can't say how the next fifteen minutes will go ... whats your point? One makes assumptions on a game based on a team's past performance as a whole. As a result, given Milan's consitency in Europe AND Serie A vis-a-vis Liverpool's 5th place in Premier and 'shockers' in Europe I think its fair to say WHO the favorite is.
Milan were never in danger of getting booted out from PSV....the scoreline was never in PSV's favor to close the game. A miracle would have had to occur..it did not.
what a shame
Posted on that second point on another thread, no point doubling up here.
Funny you mention that. Because here is what gets me. For years I have been hearing the English sports media criticize Italian football, Italian coaches, Italian teams and Serie A as a whole for its 'playing style' and mentality. Labelling it 'boring'...anti-football, etc. Then we have little Liverpool which apparently to these journalists is evidence that English football is back.
Also I don't get where you are going with this. It's always been that way in Europe. The issue with English fans and Italian football has been about the Italian league (sure it was amplifed in last years CL final) but European stage is different and English teams have always played defensive football in it when it's the smart choice.
The negative press for Italian football in England is mostly about the games is over at 70minutes thing, how Italian teams often seem to just agree on a result and how Italian football is slow and almost dead at many points. None of those attributes can be put to the Liverpool - Chelsea game.
This game was like last years final? Hmm sorry I must have missed it when I was having heart murmors because of the tension. Last year I was finding it hard to stay awake.
However,
Hmmm interesting strategy...when Italians do it ..its called 'catenaccio'...when Liverpool does it they call it "heart"..perseverance, etc.
Sell that sh*t to the tourists....Liverpool 'ripped' a page from the catenaccio text book.
Hmmm interesting strategy...when Italians do it ..its called 'catenaccio'...when Liverpool does it they call it "heart"..perseverance, etc.
Sell that sh*t to the tourists....Liverpool 'ripped' a page from the catenaccio text book.
Actually no. Because what PSV did Liverpool cannot. Liverpool has not gotten to the final playing like PSV. Had Milan had a 2-0 goal lead on Liverpool it would have been a much less stressful night than tonight. Liverpool has not exactly exemplified 'offense' and attacking power.
Problem for Liverpool is this: Milan COMES UP BIG in the BIG GAMES. Its the small games they have trouble with. The Siena's..the Messina's...the Second legs after having a cushy lead, etc.
Milan put Inter away in the first match...they put Man U away and they put PSV away in the first match (sort of).
Milan put Inter away in the first match...they put Man U away and they put PSV away in the first match (sort of).
I am actually happy Chelsea did not make it...for one year it puts the Russian's mentality of buying a CL title to rest and proves it can't be done that easily.
Though if they had won the hunger would have gone and Roman might have found a new toy to play with.
