I'm still a bit drowsy so I didn't quite follow the discussion a few pages back but if I remember correctly, somebody was defending the European media?
Lemme tell you a little story that happened a few months ago:
A German news station sent a crew down to a high school in East Berlin (sorry, just Berlin I guess) because it was alledgedly a teacher's worst nightmare. In the report they made (I saw it cause they wouldn't shut up promoting it), it became quite clear this high school was the epitome of anarchy. The students (mostly of Moroccan descent and Muslim - this is where it gets juicy) ran the place, teachers had nothing to say. They didn't go to classes, they just hung out in the school yard doing nothing. They terrorised the neighbourhood and teachers alike; the hierarchy that had formed on that school resembled that of a prison etc etc
Germany was shocked, the political class vowed to take action against 'the immigrant problem' and racial tensions rised.
A few weeks later a Dutch camera crew went to have a look to see how big the problems really were and if it could spread through Europe (like we feared the French riots could). When the Netwerk crew arrived, they found a relatively normal school. Sure it was in a poor neighbourhood and the teaching materials were a bit disappointing, but anarchy wasn't exactly the right word to describe it. Upon doing some investigating, students made some surprising comments they were willing to make to a foreign TV station: the German journalists a few weeks earlier had offered them vast amounts of money to drill up some lines and play a few scenes. The kids, being poor as they are in that part of town, of course took it. What did they have to lose? It's not like their reputation was anything worth to write home about anyway.
And that, is how the media work.