Neymar - Forward - PSG (15 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
What do you mean, finding players on the cheap and developing them into amongst the worlds greatest?
No.. What I mean is that prior to the internet and technology explosion, Neymar probably wouldn't ahve cost 45 million because the information about him would have been scarcer than it is now. I'm talking about the price.

When your face and quality of play is plastered all over the world, of course the price is going to go up.

The more you see, the more you want. The more you want, the higher the cost.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
No doubt about that. Too much money in football these days. If Zizou was 22 now he'd be going to Arsenal in the summer.

We need to take a different route, that based on nurturing youth, if we want to compete. The good old days were nice and we won a lot under the Moggi plan, but those days are not coming back unless we adapt to the new environment in football.
Oh, you mean like back in 2006-2007 when this revolution should have taken place?
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,957
Palermo signed Kjær, Pastore, Ilicic, Cavani and Hernández. Napoli signed Hamsik and Lavezzi. Fiorentina signed Jovetić. Udinese signed Zapata and Sanchez.

We can do it but with a good balance signing other established players in case the youngsters aren't ready yet. Being patient and giving youngsters a chance to shine.
But this isn't the Old Juve school. These players were brought over from South America, we rarely did that unless we liked some Uruguayan or somebody named Gladstone.

I like this approach, bringing in good young guns, especially from other parts of the world. But will we take that route, especially the South American route? I doubt it, at least on a scale like Palermo or Udinese. Instead we'll try to buy players after they are already a big hit in Europe, meaning their price tags are enormous.

We should hire some of these scouts from Palermo, Benfica, et cetera. They seem to always find some good talent out there.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
Palermo signed Kjær, Pastore, Ilicic, Cavani and Hernández. Napoli signed Hamsik and Lavezzi. Fiorentina signed Jovetić. Udinese signed Zapata and Sanchez.

We can do it but with a good balance signing other established players in case the youngsters aren't ready yet. Being patient and giving youngsters a chance to shine.
2006-2007. That is all I'm going to say. that is when this should have started. However, the management at the time were foolishly impatient once they got promoted, and instead of re-building the squad the right way, with young talent, and being mid table for a couple of years in exchange for a decade of greatness, they fell under the weight of what juventus is all about. Win now, at any cost.

The teams overachieved those first two years back, but anyone could see that this was going to be a house of cards. There were no young franchise talents that were brought up, adn the ones that had a chance, or didn't have a chance, were shipped off in order to get more established players. Problem is, those established players weren't very good.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,716
Those days are long since gone.

Welcome to the world of the internet and viral vidoes, and sky sports, ESPN, Fox, all over the world.

The Platini, DelPiero, and Zidane are long since gone, because there wasn't nearly as much information available to them back in those days.
Dzeko, Pastore, Illicic, Menez, etc...all came out of no where...even where youtube, Fox, ESPN, etc all cover and they did not cost nearly as much to get when found than they do now.

We can still get the Platini's, DPs, Zidanes, etc we just aren't looking hard enough. Who knows, maybe this Piazon kid could turn out to be the next and signed for peanuts compared to a 40m Neymar and 30m Coentrao.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Gourcuff -- 22M Euros to Lyon.

Right, another drop in the bucket. And he didn't even do that well in Serie A.
I'm pretty shure you never saw this man play at bordeaux

he was the main reason they got so far in the championsleague, giving nearly every assist to chamack

Oh and he is also a regular in the frensh national team since


and you say we should get neymar who only proved his attitude ? for even more money ?

:sergio:
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,957
Dzeko, Pastore, Illicic, Menez, etc...all came out of no where...even where youtube, Fox, ESPN, etc all cover and they did not cost nearly as much to get when found than they do now.

We can still get the Platini's, DPs, Zidanes, etc we just aren't looking hard enough. Who knows, maybe this Piazon kid could turn out to be the next and signed for peanuts compared to a 40m Neymar and 30m Coentrao.
Neymar is a better talent than all of them.

His price is high because he's extremely good for his age. His numbers are crazy good. He is more than just tricks -- anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they're talking about.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
Dzeko, Pastore, Illicic, Menez, etc...all came out of no where...even where youtube, Fox, ESPN, etc all cover and they did not cost nearly as much to get when found than they do now.

We can still get the Platini's, DPs, Zidanes, etc we just aren't looking hard enough. Who knows, maybe this Piazon kid could turn out to be the next and signed for peanuts compared to a 40m Neymar and 30m Coentrao.
But look at the teams that originally signed them. This here is the core of the problem. You very rarely see a top flight team invest in very young players, ones that you "hope" will turn into something special. They were all mid-table teams that signed these young guys. That is the "Mid Table Approach". And to be quite honest, if you want to build a fantastic base of talent, that is the way to go.

My mantra when juve came out of Serie B was "Act Mid Table, but think Top Flight". Meaning, they needed to realize that the team was on the cusp of falling apart due to the age of the returning players, and they should have dedicated more funds to signing the young talents, such as the way Napoli, Fiorentina, and Palermo do. It would have taken a few more years to get back to top flight status, but Christ, wouldn't it have been worth it?
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,957
I'm pretty shure you never saw this man play at bordeaux

he was the main reason they got so far in the championsleague, giving nearly every assist to chamack

Oh and he is also a regular in the frensh national team since
I saw him quite a lot. He was great for Bordeaux, not as good with Lyon so far. We should have bought him for that price.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
I'm pretty shure you never saw this man play at bordeaux

he was the main reason they got so far in the championsleague, giving nearly every assist to chamack

Oh and he is also a regular in the frensh national team since




and you say we should get neymar who only proved his attitude ? for even more money ?

:sergio:
Gourcuff was pruchased by Milan for 3.5 million. Granted, they made a huge mistake by eventually selling him, but the point is that even Milan does a better job of scouting than juventus.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
No.. What I mean is that prior to the internet and technology explosion, Neymar probably wouldn't ahve cost 45 million because the information about him would have been scarcer than it is now. I'm talking about the price.

When your face and quality of play is plastered all over the world, of course the price is going to go up.

The more you see, the more you want. The more you want, the higher the cost.
That's the problem, very few good young talents are "cheap" today. Market mechanics are quite different now.
Of course, especially when he (Neymar) is heralded as the successor to Ronaldo and such. I don't think it's impossible to find special talents on the cheap, Palermo have got Ilicic and Pastore for reasonable sums and will almost certainly make a big profit from selling each. Not everyone has the same hype he has is what I'm saying, hopefully the club is doing the right thing in finding all these Italian youngsters (new Baggio and Chiellini etc) alongside Sørensen/Magnusson/Branescu.

We have to find them at the right age, because the majority of footballers are starting off their careers younger now. I remember 2 seasons ago when our old chief scout was hailing Hazard as something special, his price back then would have been 5-10m, and now it's over 20m. Palermo did well for Ilicic, Juventus SHOULD have got Hamsik. It's the fault of the club. I definitely agree with what has been said about improving the youth facilities and getting players through that into the first team. Part of the reason I was so in favour of purchasing James Rodríguez last year (and look who got him, Porto) and Lucas Piazon this year, both aren't at astronomical values currently.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,716
Neymar is a better talent than all of them.

His price is high because he's extremely good for his age. His numbers are crazy good. He is more than just tricks -- anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they're talking about.
I'm not disagreeing with you here on the matter on Neymar. I am just saying that our club would be so much better off finding the talent first instead of paying the huge fees after someone else found him first.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,716
But look at the teams that originally signed them. This here is the core of the problem. You very rarely see a top flight team invest in very young players, ones that you "hope" will turn into something special. They were all mid-table teams that signed these young guys. That is the "Mid Table Approach". And to be quite honest, if you want to build a fantastic base of talent, that is the way to go.

My mantra when juve came out of Serie B was "Act Mid Table, but think Top Flight". Meaning, they needed to realize that the team was on the cusp of falling apart due to the age of the returning players, and they should have dedicated more funds to signing the young talents, such as the way Napoli, Fiorentina, and Palermo do. It would have taken a few more years to get back to top flight status, but Christ, wouldn't it have been worth it?
Again I agree with both you and Andy. If we would have signed at least 1 young lad with massive potential for peanuts since we came back from B we could have 4-5 fantastic players already in this squad and those peanuts we spent on them the remainder of the transfer kitty could have brought in top proven talent.

I see no reason why, even now, we can't blend the 2 together. Look at Napoli, each year they are spending more and more but that's because they have scouts that know what to do and have players that sell out the stadium every game. We need to have a better business approach to building a good team.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,716
Of course, especially when he (Neymar) is heralded as the successor to Ronaldo and such. I don't think it's impossible to find special talents on the cheap, Palermo have got Ilicic and Pastore for reasonable sums and will almost certainly make a big profit from selling each. Not everyone has the same hype he has is what I'm saying, hopefully the club is doing the right thing in finding all these Italian youngsters (new Baggio and Chiellini etc) alongside Sørensen/Magnusson/Branescu.

We have to find them at the right age, because the majority of footballers are starting off their careers younger now. I remember 2 seasons ago when our old chief scout was hailing Hazard as something special, his price back then would have been 5-10m, and now it's over 20m. Palermo did well for Ilicic, Juventus SHOULD have got Hamsik. It's the fault of the club. I definitely agree with what has been said about improving the youth facilities and getting players through that into the first team. Part of the reason I was so in favour of purchasing James Rodríguez last year (and look who got him, Porto) and Lucas Piazon this year, both aren't at astronomical values currently.
Yes.


(You all are posting too quickly. Every time I post a new one pops up I want to reply too. :sergio:)
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,957
Of course, especially when he (Neymar) is heralded as the successor to Ronaldo and such. I don't think it's impossible to find special talents on the cheap, Palermo have got Ilicic and Pastore for reasonable sums and will almost certainly make a big profit from selling each. Not everyone has the same hype he has is what I'm saying, hopefully the club is doing the right thing in finding all these Italian youngsters (new Baggio and Chiellini etc) alongside Sørensen/Magnusson/Branescu.

We have to find them at the right age, because the majority of footballers are starting off their careers younger now. I remember 2 seasons ago when our old chief scout was hailing Hazard as something special, his price back then would have been 5-10m, and now it's over 20m. Palermo did well for Ilicic, Juventus SHOULD have got Hamsik. It's the fault of the club. I definitely agree with what has been said about improving the youth facilities and getting players through that into the first team. Part of the reason I was so in favour of purchasing James Rodríguez last year (and look who got him, Porto) and Lucas Piazon this year, both aren't at astronomical values currently.
If our chief scout rated Hazard so highly, then why didn't we buy him?

It's just freaking weird. Everyone saw Hamsik in B yet we didn't even make a move for him. Hazard is hailed by our chief scout and we didn't even make a move for him.

This reluctance to take a risk on young players needs to change.

I'm not disagreeing with you here on the matter on Neymar. I am just saying that our club would be so much better off finding the talent first instead of paying the huge fees after someone else found him first.
No doubt. But the difference here is that Neymar is the best talent in world football, at least IMO.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,716
If our chief scout rated Hazard so highly, then why didn't we buy him?

It's just freaking weird. Everyone saw Hamsik in B yet we didn't even make a move for him. Hazard is hailed by our chief scout and we didn't even make a move for him.

This reluctance to take a risk on young players needs to change.



No doubt. But the difference here is that Neymar is the best talent in world football, at least IMO.
If we have the money to get him or at least challenge him and still reinforce our full backs, then by all means lets go gung-ho on him.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
[QUO
If our chief scout rated Hazard so highly, then why didn't we buy him?

It's just freaking weird. Everyone saw Hamsik in B yet we didn't even make a move for him. Hazard is hailed by our chief scout and we didn't even make a move for him.

This reluctance to take a risk on young players needs to change.
I don't really know what the previous management was trying to achieve. Looking back, their 'project' was to spend without really thinking about the team. At least now it seems like the club wants to reduce the age and salary, and make the club more dependent on itself (stadium and youth system).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)