1.You should KNOW what you link, it pretty much seemed like you used that link as an advocateur of Brittish emperialism and that you agree with it by doing so (otherwise why did you link it?), when its filled with such sickening revisionism, and exudes the very definition of bigoted and narrow-minded tripe. Let me quote one of the gems: Any nation which has wealth has a duty to conquer countries less wealthy than it, another gem: Where native religions were opposed to even simple moral behaviour, they would introduce Christianity in order to right the wrongs of paganism and allow these peoples to flower.. And so on and on.
2. I did not say the rest were any different, in fact worse as in they were more rudimentary emperialists (they were more ravage and pillage short term, while Brits were "sophisticated" in their pillaging), not as advanced ruling wise. But Brittish Emperialism was BAD BAD BAD, any way you put it, no mitigating sugarcoating BS like leaving behind "prosperous" foundations cant never excuse and will NEVER excuse centuries long of sheer emperialistic tyranny.