A few days ago he wore a maga hat, now he's seen carrying a red hat. He's clearly trolling.
Buy on AliExpress.com
'Murica! (183 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fake Melo
- Start date
- Tags afl_italia's cousins forza trump smocking gun
Buy on AliExpress.com
I don't see blame, and no one said ALL voters, but there are definitely large subgroups of voters that fit into each of those categories that @Bjerknes outlined. It's just an observation. Trust me, there are equivalents for Democrats as well.
I think you're also attempting to view our election through a Dutch lens, but it doesn't fully work because of how different our elections are. Just as an example, you mentioned an "extreme party," but there really are only two here that are seen as viable. The parties that failed everyone...are the same parties that are in every election. Even for Trump to win the nomination, everyone in the background is still the same. Mitch McConnell has been a senator since 1985, now all of a sudden I'm to believe that people see him as "the good guys" out for the common man because they put their weight behind Trump after he won? It's all a show, and that makes me hate them even more. Trump insulted Cruz during the race multiple times in 2016, he took shots at his WIFE. Then after the election, it's all smiles and friendship, spineless bitch. If Trump loses, watch how they turn on him again. You don't have this problem because you had what, 15 parties in your last election? People refuse to vote third party because it's "throwing away your vote," a phrase that I LOATHE. Then of course you get the people that treat it as they would supporting a sports team, but that's another issue.
Those things you mentioned all really came to the forefront AFTER 2016 though, so they weren't really in play back then. The thing to realize here is that this portion of the Republican party was ALWAYS there. In fact, it was even bred and grown. You could have watched conservative news outlets like Fox News long before 2016 and see the similarities to today's rhetoric. But imo it seems like it went beyond what the party anticipated and instead of them controlling the narrative, the narrative now controls them through whoever steps up to do so. @acmilan's post here touches on it a bit.
Sorry if this isn't fully coherent but I was kinda rushing through it.
I think you're also attempting to view our election through a Dutch lens, but it doesn't fully work because of how different our elections are. Just as an example, you mentioned an "extreme party," but there really are only two here that are seen as viable. The parties that failed everyone...are the same parties that are in every election. Even for Trump to win the nomination, everyone in the background is still the same. Mitch McConnell has been a senator since 1985, now all of a sudden I'm to believe that people see him as "the good guys" out for the common man because they put their weight behind Trump after he won? It's all a show, and that makes me hate them even more. Trump insulted Cruz during the race multiple times in 2016, he took shots at his WIFE. Then after the election, it's all smiles and friendship, spineless bitch. If Trump loses, watch how they turn on him again. You don't have this problem because you had what, 15 parties in your last election? People refuse to vote third party because it's "throwing away your vote," a phrase that I LOATHE. Then of course you get the people that treat it as they would supporting a sports team, but that's another issue.
Those things you mentioned all really came to the forefront AFTER 2016 though, so they weren't really in play back then. The thing to realize here is that this portion of the Republican party was ALWAYS there. In fact, it was even bred and grown. You could have watched conservative news outlets like Fox News long before 2016 and see the similarities to today's rhetoric. But imo it seems like it went beyond what the party anticipated and instead of them controlling the narrative, the narrative now controls them through whoever steps up to do so. @acmilan's post here touches on it a bit.
Sorry if this isn't fully coherent but I was kinda rushing through it.
I don't even have to go that far with it. Whenever someone turns their X profile page into Trump getting shot bumper stickers and starts spouting off in all caps about how "THE LAHINA PEEPLE GOT BURNED OUT BY THERE OWN GOVNMENT BECUZ WE SAW THOSE LASERS ON TV AND WE KNOW THERE ARE REAL..." I just see a 4chan joke that's not funny anymore. Because mental illness that turns someone towards conspiracies and hatred is not funny.
Part of me hopes they are all just Russian bots trying to pull a fast one on humanity. Because the thought of an infiltrating Russian Ops program is actually far more comforting than to believe real humans are that mentally damaged and spewing all that insanity and vitriol everywhere in society.
It's not a bad theory. That would be very Dark Brandon though. He's just not the type, given that he is one of the last of the old school conciliatory politicians left of a dying breed in American politics.
Part of me hopes they are all just Russian bots trying to pull a fast one on humanity. Because the thought of an infiltrating Russian Ops program is actually far more comforting than to believe real humans are that mentally damaged and spewing all that insanity and vitriol everywhere in society.
It's not a bad theory. That would be very Dark Brandon though. He's just not the type, given that he is one of the last of the old school conciliatory politicians left of a dying breed in American politics.
His and mccains ilk? One a notorious gaffe collecting kkk sympatizing buffoon, the other a neocon to the core, sounds pretty unifying
You dont buy for a minute a guy being mad he was the victim of a palace coup, but you do buy we are all projecting when the very same guy wears a maga hat then a few days later dangles a red hat for no apparent reason, it's not like optics are important or anything.
You dont buy for a minute a guy being mad he was the victim of a palace coup, but you do buy we are all projecting when the very same guy wears a maga hat then a few days later dangles a red hat for no apparent reason, it's not like optics are important or anything.
The guy surely isn't happy about being pushed aside. But the reality is he he had no business running, had no chance of winning, the US didn't need a Feinstein in Chief, and he should have stepped aside for reelection last year.
Being cynical and trolling his VP's campaign seems well out of character for him. Playing around as a senile 81-year-old on his last victory lap is one thing. But not everyone is naturally as cynical as they might be themselves.
Andries believed Tifoso Lou was a pedophile as no one can genuinely be that friendly without something they're hiding. I get where that cynicism comes from. But I've also met people who, despite the personal demons everyone has, are generally optimists who are oriented to always trying to help.
And I will go out on a limb and still claim that Andries was more wrong about Tifoso Lou than right, given my offline exchanges. Dark Brandon is a joke because Biden's dark side is simpdom, really.
Being cynical and trolling his VP's campaign seems well out of character for him. Playing around as a senile 81-year-old on his last victory lap is one thing. But not everyone is naturally as cynical as they might be themselves.
Andries believed Tifoso Lou was a pedophile as no one can genuinely be that friendly without something they're hiding. I get where that cynicism comes from. But I've also met people who, despite the personal demons everyone has, are generally optimists who are oriented to always trying to help.
And I will go out on a limb and still claim that Andries was more wrong about Tifoso Lou than right, given my offline exchanges. Dark Brandon is a joke because Biden's dark side is simpdom, really.
One of the odder things about this whole replacement theory with immigration isn’t just that people believe “freedom” entitles them to a right to determine who can live near them and what god they worship, which is pretty totalitarian in its own right.
It’s that somehow the victimization entitlement of unemployed, drug-addled white people is somehow better than the victimization entitlement of unemployed, drug-addled “woke” minorities.
It’s that somehow the victimization entitlement of unemployed, drug-addled white people is somehow better than the victimization entitlement of unemployed, drug-addled “woke” minorities.
Jack Posobiec now hates Bosnians.
https://x.com/jackposobiec/status/1835016597297094789?s=46&t=44zFspkwtn4Oth1i9vk6Xg
Dude has never had lamb before.
https://x.com/jackposobiec/status/1835016597297094789?s=46&t=44zFspkwtn4Oth1i9vk6Xg
Dude has never had lamb before.
Really, how different is any of this from:
* Pizzagate, claiming there was a cannibal pedophile cabal drinking children's blood in the basement of Comet Ping Pong
* Redlining mindsets that kept those culturally bad darkies from moving in to my whitey neighborhood
The whole thing about whether they are legal or not is just a veneer for good old fashioned tribal racism. Some things never fall out of fashion.
* Pizzagate, claiming there was a cannibal pedophile cabal drinking children's blood in the basement of Comet Ping Pong
* Redlining mindsets that kept those culturally bad darkies from moving in to my whitey neighborhood
The whole thing about whether they are legal or not is just a veneer for good old fashioned tribal racism. Some things never fall out of fashion.
