'Murica! (367 Viewers)

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
In the photos, the former President sits comfortably and laughs as Chauntae Davies, then a 22-year-old massage therapist who acted as Epstein's personal masseuse, rubs her hands into his shoulders to get out the kinks in his neck.
Look, I would be very surprised if Billy C never took advantage of the Epstein special, in fact, I expect it to be the case.

This being said, when you post an article that is supposed to thicken the plot, at least throw a cursory glance at it first.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,778
What is wrong with this? It says she was 22 at the time.

I get the outrage over the 13 y/os he was enticing in Florida but the multitude of Epstein's women in their early 20s were sex workers not victims.

I couldn't care less if Clinton or Trump banged a hooker.
Every day we get more evidence this guy was best buddies with Epstein, a pedophilia ring leader. Only a matter of time...
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
But she was a massage therapist and was hired for that purpose. :confused:

What's the difference between that and seeing a photo of Brett Kavanaugh with his arm around a woman at a college party and presuming rape?

I'd love to see trump this involved in a pedophilia ring get media a pass AND speak at a republican convention.
Q and pizza for all my friends.

I think the pee tape would have to be a ruse then.

I would be more creeped out by Bill if he was getting his sex from Hilary. What kind of sick fuck would do that?
Now you're just grossing me out. :yuck:
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
But she was a massage therapist and was hired for that purpose. :confused:

What's the difference between that and seeing a photo of Brett Kavanaugh with his arm around a woman at a college party and presuming rape?



Q and pizza for all my friends.

I think the pee tape would have to be a ruse then.



Now you're just grossing me out. :yuck:
Was Trump the pisser or the pissee?
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,658
I disagree, most of the time it's the left saying we are the better educated or our measures are the ethical ones, not to mention the drumming up of the grievances of racial/sexual or any other class which do nothing but to divide people. From personal experience, i have yet to see a conservative friend or acquaintance shame or shun another who espouses liberal values, the opposite however is all too common. Obviously the right has its own problems, elitism and division policies aren't one of them.
I disagree, the right is very exclusive at least from my point of view. I’ve lived the majority of my life in politically conservative states and have had a lot of conservative friends. I’ve been told so many times to shut the fuck up because my liberal ideas don’t matter. Just because you haven’t experienced something doesn’t make it untrue.

As for division policy, the right has thrived on division policy since the southern strategy, red lining, etc. Now it’s dog whistles and “real” America.

On the whole both parties are super inclusive within their own spectrum. But not with each other. And that’s the big problem.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
I disagree, the right is very exclusive at least from my point of view. I’ve lived the majority of my life in politically conservative states and have had a lot of conservative friends. I’ve been told so many times to shut the fuck up because my liberal ideas don’t matter. Just because you haven’t experienced something doesn’t make it untrue.

As for division policy, the right has thrived on division policy since the southern strategy, red lining, etc. Now it’s dog whistles and “real” America.

On the whole both parties are super inclusive within their own spectrum. But not with each other. And that’s the big problem.
Sure but the rhetoric from the left is more concerning right now considering the level of power they hold over media and education as well as how their dogma seems to put the dumbest and most unstable members at the top of pecking order.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Sure but the rhetoric from the left is more concerning right now considering the level of power they hold over media and education as well as how their dogma seems to put the dumbest and most unstable members at the top of pecking order.
You’re saying this at a time when the right has elected the most unstable dumbass to ever become president. :shifty:

- - - Updated - - -

lmao didn’t republicans nominate trump for president?
you beat me to it lol
 

Ronn

Mes Que Un Club
May 3, 2012
20,863
Stone, who the committee found had advance knowledge that the tape would be coming out, told an associate, Jerome Corsi, that he “wanted the Podesta stuff to balance the news cycle” and later Stone told him to have WikiLeaks “drop the Podesta emails immediately,” per Corsi. John Podesta was Clinton’s campaign chairman.”

Russia hoax :baus:
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
lmao didn’t republicans nominate trump for president?
Considering the 2016 conservative rallies. Trump kinda worked his way up in the pecking order to end up beeing the nominated one. Mostly by shutting down competitors , sometimes be going personal (Jeb Bush), sometimes by making big comeback speeches to play into the emotional part (9/11 trowing Cruz out)

So you have Trump. Picturing quite an arrey of rather extreme positions or traits.


So you'd think that the liberals would trow their best candidates at them ? Wel to be honest, they are worse.

- When Sanders was relevant and leading, reaching youth and many across the nation. They shut him down for Clinton, who is literally hated by over a third of the nation. One could argue more people hate clinton compared to trump in 2016.

- The democrats had the perfect female candidate. Central minded. All the presence. All the believes that the US really needs to go from here.
Nah. Trown out early.
In comes a bunch of really not very good candidates. And the more extreme, the better support they get.

If the democrats dont win the 2020 election, they literally, undisputedly, had a worse inferior nomine compared to Trump

- - - Updated - - -

Does that make what I said untrue? No, it doesn't.
It offcourse doesnt.

But what i learned from liberals, is that when you make a good point, they wont debate your point, but find ways to turn it in a different light.


Basically, a german citizen cannot say Putin is a bad person, because you once had hitler.

I dont like this rethoric.
 

Ronn

Mes Que Un Club
May 3, 2012
20,863
Sure but the rhetoric from the left is more concerning right now considering the level of power they hold over media and education as well as how their dogma seems to put the dumbest and most unstable members at the top of pecking order.
I’m confused. Democrats elected the establishment candidates in both 2016 and 2020. Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi have also been around for ages. Who are you referring to?
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
Trump claimed that we would seek a third term and here you guys are getting upset over genderqueer Tumblr bloggers. At least you have your priorities right.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-says-ll-seek-third-000717298.html
Literally nobody here is. Its about as real as your concerns that Trump will get a third term.

- - - Updated - - -

Considering the 2016 conservative rallies. Trump kinda worked his way up in the pecking order to end up beeing the nominated one. Mostly by shutting down competitors , sometimes be going personal (Jeb Bush), sometimes by making big comeback speeches to play into the emotional part (9/11 trowing Cruz out)

So you have Trump. Picturing quite an arrey of rather extreme positions or traits.


So you'd think that the liberals would trow their best candidates at them ? Wel to be honest, they are worse.

- When Sanders was relevant and leading, reaching youth and many across the nation. They shut him down for Clinton, who is literally hated by over a third of the nation. One could argue more people hate clinton compared to trump in 2016.

- The democrats had the perfect female candidate. Central minded. All the presence. All the believes that the US really needs to go from here.
Nah. Trown out early.
In comes a bunch of really not very good candidates. And the more extreme, the better support they get.

If the democrats dont win the 2020 election, they literally, undisputedly, had a worse inferior nomine compared to Trump

- - - Updated - - -



It offcourse doesnt.

But what i learned from liberals, is that when you make a good point, they wont debate your point, but find ways to turn it in a different light.


Basically, a german citizen cannot say Putin is a bad person, because you once had hitler.

I dont like this rethoric.
Thats because the democratic party has a delicate process. They have to court the radical vote (its the only momentum, the only passion in their base) but the people in charge actually don't want any sort of real or systemic change in the slightest.

So they have to find a way to capitalize off the it without actually giving anything it wants. its a complicated process and their chosen path seems to be to dangle progressive candidates in front of them, rig the game against them, then provoke racial animosity. It charges the base and provides useful misdirection for the fact the Dem estabilishment is taking your money while robbing you of any choice to pick the candidate who is supposed to represent you.

You won't actually get any of the progressive reforms you want, but you do get a free pass to express your violent hatred of white America.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 17, Guests: 334)