Do they really? Wyoming maybe, but I have to say that when driving through Montana almost everyone I met looked mentally ill. Montana's friggin' nasty.
Buy on AliExpress.com
'Murica! (222 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fake Melo
- Start date
- Tags afl_italia's cousins forza trump smocking gun
Do they really? Wyoming maybe, but I have to say that when driving through Montana almost everyone I met looked mentally ill. Montana's friggin' nasty.
Buy on AliExpress.com
this @Hustini 
https://www.facebook.com/100009197417874/videos/1443919179257982/
- - - Updated - - -
it is one thing to satire and another to actually 'do'
i think this jon stewart deification is pretty ridiculous
https://www.facebook.com/100009197417874/videos/1443919179257982/
- - - Updated - - -
I wish jon stewart was running for president
i think this jon stewart deification is pretty ridiculous
Yep. Had to largely agree with a NYT op ed yesterday:
Jon Stewart, Patron Saint of Liberal Smugness
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/09/opinion/sunday/jon-stewart-patron-saint-of-liberal-smugness.html
It's always so much easier to destroy than to create.
Jon Stewart, Patron Saint of Liberal Smugness
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/09/opinion/sunday/jon-stewart-patron-saint-of-liberal-smugness.html
It's always so much easier to destroy than to create.
"Specifically, they believe that liberals are much more open to change than conservatives, more tolerant of differences, more motivated by the public good and, maybe most of all, smarter and better informed. The evidence for these beliefs is not good. Liberals turn out to be just as prone to their own forms of intolerance, ignorance and bias. But the beliefs are comforting to many."
Those "comforting beliefs" (at least the part regarding tolerance of differences and change) have also roots in research that have conducted much better studies in much better labs, having used far better methodologies and exploited much more representative samples than the research the author cites. That part coming from a professor (and not a journalist or reporter) makes it even more strange to me.
Those "comforting beliefs" (at least the part regarding tolerance of differences and change) have also roots in research that have conducted much better studies in much better labs, having used far better methodologies and exploited much more representative samples than the research the author cites. That part coming from a professor (and not a journalist or reporter) makes it even more strange to me.
Yep. We already have too many politicians who sit back and take pot-shots at things without contributing anything as it is.
I wouldn't say it was his job as much as it was a missed opportunity as potential targets. There's a wide swath of potential mockery that Stewart avoided that was ripe for the picking, and he essentially chose not to over ideology.
Strange, yes, but not wholly inaccurate. Why liberals often attract such ire is the sense of self-importance that they are intellectually and/or morally superior to others ... when in fact the only major difference is an unwillingness to admit to one's own faults and flaws.
I wouldn't say it was his job as much as it was a missed opportunity as potential targets. There's a wide swath of potential mockery that Stewart avoided that was ripe for the picking, and he essentially chose not to over ideology.
Strange, yes, but not wholly inaccurate. Why liberals often attract such ire is the sense of self-importance that they are intellectually and/or morally superior to others ... when in fact the only major difference is an unwillingness to admit to one's own faults and flaws.
