'Murica! (376 Viewers)

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
As fun as it is to read his Wikipedia page, it is painfully obvious that he is unwell and has a mental disorder. Apart from the incoherent nonsense coming out of his mouth, there's also the issue of things going into his mouth. I am sure that there have been a few morbidly obese people who were in good shape mentally. But, even if Americans refuse to believe this, the sad reality is that in 99% of the cases morbidly obese people are unhealthy on an emotional level as well.

One should be able to discern that he is a very sick man well under three minutes of seeing him and listening to him. The fact that he is not only still considered a normal member of society, but is even promoted to the highest political ranks tells me there is a lot of work to be done to educate the American public.
But we all know there are mentally disabled people like Mark Robinson.

What's new are people who vote to be lead by such mentally disabled people.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
18,310
As fun as it is to read his Wikipedia page, it is painfully obvious that he is unwell and has a mental disorder.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source at all as many editors simply can doing nasty edit on every article. I'm saying this coz I have an account there and often edit some articles. Managers and Authorities treat in a tasteful manner. Edits on subjects can be reverted even though contexts are qualified. Many contents are clear personal commentary.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,522
is there any non banana republic country where this is legal

(even a banana republic is likely to ban this shit and then simply not enforce the law lol)

 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,778
Seems like a stretch to me tbh. Yeah sure technically that woman could be an eventual voter, but so could anyone over 18. They're just in a grocery store and 1 and a half months out from election day.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,307
Wikipedia is not a reliable source at all as many editors simply can doing nasty edit on every article. I'm saying this coz I have an account there and often edit some articles. Managers and Authorities treat in a tasteful manner. Edits on subjects can be reverted even though contexts are qualified. Many contents are clear personal commentary.
Not everyone can edit every article.

And you'll see that in many articles almost everything is referenced. With Robinson in particular it's really just a summary of stupid shit he said. Everything links to news articles. So yes, the page on him is very reliable.

He's just insane.
 

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
18,310
Not everyone can edit every article.

And you'll see that in many articles almost everything is referenced. With Robinson in particular it's really just a summary of stupid shit he said. Everything links to news articles. So yes, the page on him is very reliable.

He's just insane.
I might be wrong as I don't follow political issues seriously.

You can see the history of edits here:

 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,658

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 17, Guests: 335)