'Murica! (245 Viewers)

Valerio.

Senior Member
Jul 5, 2014
5,746
I'm not even a fan of policies like Affirmative Action, I also do not like the idea of giving preference to minorities just because they are minorities, but you're just a conspiracy nutjob who sees things that just aren't there.
wow conspiracy nutjob.... the would mean i give a fuck about american stuff right? fact is i'm simply entertained by the whole thing and as someone who: 1) doesn't follow the whole thing 2) doesn't give a flying ..... about it 3) not even close to America.

All we know here , in our backward ass country, is that media play a huge role in these things in America and that they tend to covet for minorities to have "power" it's simply a easy and childish (i admit it) way to know see what's going to happen in the future.

As someone not involved the whole thing i don't need to get trough the whole thing.
Summing up
Hillary Clinton= wife of an ex-president, woman = high chances to win
Donald Trump= bufoon, lot of money, sexist, anti minorities= low/nil chances to win
rest = don't even know whoe they are and not even heard their names. = no chances to win.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,943
Valerio is right in that Hillary will garner a ton of votes simply because she's a woman and everyone loves Bill. These people are just as moronic as Trump supporters, if not worse. This bitch should be in jail.
 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
That too.

Is Bernie Sanders a chance?
He's got a chance, but a very slim one, read what I wrote above:

Rather unlikely sadly. He may be able to win both Iowa & New Hampshire, but after that it's going south for him.

Only way I could see him winning the nomination are blowout victories in the two first states generating enough momentum for him to win over the minorities.
 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
:agree:

And with the movement Sanders has, it's extremely difficult to predict voter/caucus turnout, which is absolutely deciding in this case. There definitely is still hope, we'll know a lot more after today. If he loses Iowa, it will be virtually impossible.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,943
How about the votes she won't get cause she's a woman?
I have never heard of a Democrat that would not vote for a woman. Maybe it's something like two people overall.

Study: Bernie Sanders's single-payer plan is almost twice as expensive as he says

Just one economist's opinion, but still.

http://www.vox.com/2016/1/28/10858644/bernie-sanders-kenneth-thorpe-single-payer
@Bjerknes
"would require workers to pay an additional 20 percent of their compensation in taxes" :baggio:

Of course Bernie Sanders has no clue what his own plans would cost. Neither Sanders or anybody else in that party cares about the true cost of any social or spending program, and the proof is in the fact they never, ever discuss it.
 

Ronn

Mes Que Un Club
May 3, 2012
20,865
I have never heard of a Democrat that would not vote for a woman. Maybe it's something like two people overall.



"would require workers to pay an additional 20 percent of their compensation in taxes" :baggio:

Of course Bernie Sanders has no clue what his own plans would cost. Neither Sanders or anybody else in that party cares about the true cost of any social or spending program, and the proof is in the fact they never, ever discuss it.
Much like republicans care about cost of their tax cuts
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,784
Early results are showing Cruz and Clinton leading by very slight margins. Still a long way to go though.

Cruz at 30% compared to Trump at 27% (25% in)

Clinton at 51% compared to Sanders at 48% (54% in)

This according to CNN.

- - - Updated - - -

Much like republicans care about cost of their tax cuts
Or military spending.
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,784
His numbers actually seem to be increasing while Trump is decreasing, was not expecting that at all. Fucking Clinton though...I can't see her losing now. 65% reporting in and she's leading, although it's still slim.
 

Ronn

Mes Que Un Club
May 3, 2012
20,865
One of the things about "Trumpeters" was that while they supported Trump in the polls, they were not expected to have a high turnout like everyone else. Rubio sitting at 22% is quite a surprise though.
Clinton will probably win by a very slim margin. But because of the way delegates are assigned, that may not even be a big advantage. Given that she's going to lose New Hampshire she has to score big in SC and NV. Otherwise their fight may go on for some time.
And surprise! O'malley is suspending his campaign
 

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,320
It's 50 and 49.4 now.
Cruz showing you can lie through your teeth, get caught and still win.
Rubio is killing it though. Good for him.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 17, Guests: 205)