Mumbai Shootings (11 Viewers)

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
icεmαή;1823612 said:
Question to each one of you... Try and answer in a word or two...
Q. What according to you is the lowest level of terrorism? I'll just make the question a little bit more clear... If terrorism was a big structure created using lego blocks of various sizes, what is the smallest lego block (according to you)?
Telemarketers
 
OP
.zero

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,815
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #203
    fine, i'll wait until this case is closed or at least who organized and executed the attacks is discovered. once that is determined then i will point the finger. and if it is pakistan (not the govt) then i will relish the backlash and denial from folks around here.
     

    HelterSkelter

    Senior Member
    Apr 15, 2005
    20,572
    @Baggio.

    If the ISI had total control over the militant activity that goes on within Pakistan,then we wouldnt be hearing of suicide atacks every second day.If the ISI,or the Pakistani Govt had enough control,then the entire extremism mess that we're going through wouldnt exist.The ISI cannot keep check on everyone from Afghanistan,Uzbekistan,and all people from other nationalities on the north western border in check.The entire network is too large,and much too complicated.

    The current Government is full of dotards.Zardari is a fucktard,and so is Gillani.They will make idiotic statements time and again.Musharraf would have handled this situation much better.Hell,even Benazir would have handled it well.Im personally hoping for a Government overthrow yet again,with Kayani coming into power,and with the way things are developing with regards to national security and the way Gillani and Zardari are acting,a Kayani coup could well be on the cards.

    @Dru

    I acted defensive because i got the feeling that you were targetting Pakistan.My apologies if that wasnt the case.
     

    HelterSkelter

    Senior Member
    Apr 15, 2005
    20,572
    icεmαή;1823612 said:
    Q. What according to you is the lowest level of terrorism? I'll just make the question a little bit more clear... If terrorism was a big structure created using lego blocks of various sizes, what is the smallest lego block (according to you)?
    Bullying at school?:D
     

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
    Admitting it is more than enough but very few do it.
    Admitting you're wrong is no problem. The whole point of reaching a conclusion is to make the best possible assessment of the available facts. At some later point you may receive new facts that invalidate your previous conclusion and cause you to change your mind. This process, surprising to some, starts when you're born and continues until you're dead, so I don't see the big deal frankly.

    People whose goal is to never change their mind are like George Bush, always making the wrong decisions. How anyone can admire that I don't know.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,382
    Admitting you're wrong is no problem. The whole point of reaching a conclusion is to make the best possible assessment of the available facts. At some later point you may receive new facts that invalidate your previous conclusion and cause you to change your mind. This process, surprising to some, starts when you're born and continues until you're dead, so I don't see the big deal frankly.

    People whose goal is to never change their mind are like George Bush, always making the wrong decisions. How anyone can admire that I don't know.
    Yea this is also something. When someone goes on about he's a man of his word is much worse than not admitting being wrong.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)