icεmαή;2608458 said:
The whole idea is providing a different experience. If Product B was more or less the same as Product A, whats the use? Its like saying Android devices should look and act like the iPhone if it wants to capture the market. It might be true, but it defeats the purpose.
Well, that's the other possibility. Basically you have two choices:
1) Convince users of Product A that your app is so superior that they should switch no matter how many habits they have to give up. Essentially convince them that "you're doing it wrong".
2) Convince users of Product A that your app is "not really that different, you can still use what you know, but it's just a bit nicer".
Needless to say, extremely rarely do you succeed with #1. I was trying to do that back in 2003 to get IE users to Mozilla. And it worked because Mozilla really was that superior. But that doesn't happen so often.
And imo iPhone or Android doesn't have nearly a good enough story at the moment to recruit users from the rival using #1.
icεmαή;2608458 said:
Also some of the default settings in the browsers you might have used doesn't make sense. For example, a Ctrl+Tab on Firefox (3.0) will give you the next Tab. On Opera it'll give you the previous Tab. So if you have four tabs open, if you want to shift between Tab1 and Tab3, you don't need to go through Tab2 and Tab4. Very much like you would do on an OS. Do a Alt+Tab on most OS will give you the previous application.
Actually I don't like Ctrl+Tab and never really used it. I prefer to use the mouse scrollwheel to cycle between tabs (like in Konqueror, vim etc). But in FF there are some extensions that makes your browser more "keyboard enabled" which I use, so you can change tabs, scroll up and down etc all from the keyboard (and just using single keys, not Ctrl or Alt).