Movie Talk (New Films, Old Films... doesn't matter) (34 Viewers)

[Osman]

In 3D, insane picture quality, takes some getting used to, but Mr Jackson knows his shit to say the least.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Enron]

The fps here want advertised. But it was 3D both times.

If you saw it in 3D you saw it in 48 frames per second.

 

[Osman]

The fps here want advertised. But it was 3D both times.

You didnt notice it was anything but a regular 3D flick? Seen 10 or so flicks in 3D and yeah this one stood out big time.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

You didnt notice it was anything but a regular 3D flick? Seen 10 or so flicks in 3D and yeah this one stood out big time.

The only time the difference was noticeable was during a scene that showed a waterfall. I'd never seen such smooth framerate before.

 

[Enron]

You didnt notice it was anything but a regular 3D flick? Seen 10 or so flicks in 3D and yeah this one stood out big time.

Did you think it was better than normal 3D or was it too distracting?

 

[Völler]

If you saw it in 3D you saw it in 48 frames per second.

Not true. It was shown in 24 FPS in 3D as well. As a matter of fact, I saw it in 24 FPS in 3D.

 

[Osman]

It takes getting used to, certain movements felt awkward within the frame, but in general way way better 3D experience then anything not called Avatar. Didnt go into it expecting anything out of the ordinary, but that it was double the usual in FPS was very new experience.

 

[Völler]

It takes getting used to, certain movements felt awkward within the frame, but in general way way better 3D experience then anything not called Avatar.

You missed out on some 3D films, I see.

 

[Enron]

Not true. It was shown in 24 FPS in 3D as well. As a matter of fact, I saw it in 24 FPS in 3D.

Wasn't aware of that. Around here all I've seen advertised is 3D 48FPS and 2D 24FPS.

Not that it actually matters, just trying to sort whether it is worth seeing at the faster frame rate.

- - - Updated - - -

You missed out on some 3D films, I see.

Hugo was pretty boss.

 

[Völler]

Hugo was pretty boss.

Just the film I was going to highlight!

 

[Enron]

Granted I'm not a huge fan of 3D. But if it's done really well, I'll check it out.

 

[Osman]

You missed out on some 3D films, I see.

Pretty much seen any notable 3D film except Hugo prolly.mainly because here they force you to see premieres on 3D only.

 

[Völler]

Granted I'm not a huge fan of 3D. But if it's done really well, I'll check it out.

To be honest I'd go watch it in 3D 48 fps if you aren't a big fan of the LOTR trilogy. If you are a big fan and you are expecting a lot from the movie, I would watch it in 24 fps - because you are going to use some time getting used to the different technology (at least, that's what everybody says).

 

[swag]

Is fps frames or faps per second?

 

[Enron]

To be honest I'd go watch it in 3D 48 fps if you aren't a big fan of the LOTR trilogy. If you are a big fan and you are expecting a lot from the movie, I would watch it in 24 fps - because you are going to use some time getting used to the different technology (at least, that's what everybody says).

I'll probably see it in 2D and then think about the 48 fps.

 

[Völler]

Pretty much seen any notable 3D film except Hugo prolly.mainly because here they force you to see premieres on 3D only.

Hugo, Life of Pi, Avatar and Prometheus used 3D better than The Hobbit if you ask me.

 

[Osman]

Holy shit imagine porn in 48FPS

 

[Enron]

Holy shit imagine porn in 48FPS

No. Porn in HD is weird. I couldn't imagine it that clear.

 

[Völler]

No. Porn in HD is weird. I couldn't imagine it that clear.

Porn in HD is weird?!?!?! Dude, you haven't seen the light yet...
The problem about watching porn in HD is that if you have tried it, you can't get yourself to watch those 240p pixelated videos again.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Hugo, Life of Pi, Avatar and Prometheus used 3D better than The Hobbit if you ask me.

No way! I saw Life Of Pi on the same day as The Hobbit, and the latter was MUCH better.