And objective and criticism coming from you? Are you freaking kidding me? Do you read the things you post? You instult, belittle and talk shit 99% of the time in your posts. Sorry but that's not constructive criticism. Read the exchange me and Hustini are doing, that's called constructive criticism.
You need to get over yourself. I talk shit to
you 99% of the time because I don't like
you. Personally, I find you to be one of the most subjective posters on the forum, one who has a knack for being a little twit when it comes to certain player discussions. So no, you're not 99% of the forum, no matter how much you'd like to be. You don't speak for the entire forum either.
If you truly said, "I've said several times that we should sell Amauri because he isn't good enough, bringing in another poacher."; my hats off to you. We can put that on the empty sheet reserved for sensible posts you wrote. I'd appreciate a quote, though. I don't think I've ever said Amauri doesn't try, my beef with him is he doesn't score. Not near enough. But enough of him.
As for the last part, read my reply to Hustini. And I would be the last of all people to criticize strikers who don't score because of a lack of service...I mean really.
And if you blame Sissoko for us not creating chances, than you should really wonder which one of us knows how the game works.
You claimed that I hold double standards in critiquing Sissoko and Amauri. The burden of proof is on YOU. You insinuated that I blame Sissoko for all problems we face. Again, the burden of proof is on YOU.
Yes, I do blame Sissoko for hampering our possession. He's the guy who can't complete passes in a system where the CM needs to be adept at it. A professional footballer should be able to complete simple passes consistently, but he can't do that, never could. Momo was great in his first six months here from a defensive perspective, decent in the following six months, but ever since then he hasn't even been useful defensively. The trend in his performances is down and that needs to be addressed, just like Amauri's form.
But the fact that Amauri is brought up in here proves my point that he receives more shit than necessary. If there was any real evidence in support of Sissoko, then the whole Amauri discussion wouldn't have been brought up. So you're actually destroying the credibility in defending Momo, not providing him support.
But hey, thanks for wasting everyone's time, Vlatko.