Moment of Clarity (12 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
Oct 18, 2005
22,747
TonyMontana said:
Im not sure, but i think the book was called "the Bible code". There even was a Bible code 2, but i could be confusing it with the Da Vinci code but im pretty sure the name was something like that. Try googling it;)
thr problem with that is that peolpe believe the da vinci code is real and that we wre descendants of jesus and mary magdalene....idiots
anyway i have watched this thread but i will not give my thoughts,everyone has different views on religion,if i am not mistaken every religion reaches tolerance of others even if they all claim that they are the one true religion. i have friends that are catholic, protestant, muslim and atheist and there is no problem,there are some people in here that will say things just to get someone else riled and pissed off.
 

Hambon

Lion of the Desert
Apr 22, 2005
8,073
Bozi.78 said:
thr problem with that is that peolpe believe the da vinci code is real and that we wre descendants of jesus and mary magdalene....idiots
anyway i have watched this thread but i will not give my thoughts,everyone has different views on religion,if i am not mistaken every religion reaches tolerance of others even if they all claim that they are the one true religion. i have friends that are catholic, protestant, muslim and atheist and there is no problem,there are some people in here that will say things just to get someone else riled and pissed off.

Thank you bozi..i would rep u but i have to pass the love
 
Dec 19, 2005
43
a)
Seven said:
Look, axl, you can believe in whatever God you want to, but saying the Qu'ran was not written by man is disregarding all sense of logic. (And if God did exist, why would he bless us with a sense of logic that disregarded something like that?)

About the argument "you can't prove you're right either", I'll say just this:

God himself told me yesterday I was the greatest man EVER. He even told me I was his son. Then he went on about how I should start a new religion, but only after I've written down every word he dictates me.

I'm just as believable as The Prophet or Jesus to be frank. You can't prove I'm lying.
b)
Seven said:
And come to think about it, I'll go really far in this one. I believe that no religion based on a book is worth believing. That's right, I spit on the beliefs of catholics, moslims and whoever truly believe in something written down by man. However, I support people who believe in the existence of God and try to fill their lives as they please. Being religious is a human reflex and a good one for all I care, but believing a book is fucked up.
I'll just suppose I got unfairly banned for one of those two.

a) When I tell axlrose to fuck himself in the ass, I'm not saying he really should. I am however making it clear that not being able to prove something, doesn't mean you proved the opposite. E.g. "You can't prove God exist" is no argument for his existance. I don't see anything else that could have been wrong here.

b) Yep, I see why you're shocked, Zlatan. Then again, Lou has gotten off with much worse. Or isn't calling gay guys animals that bad anyway? And yes, I don't give a damn about the Bible or the Qu'ran and yes, I do find people who do total and utter morons. And they are, they undoubtedly are and I can and will prove so:

When do you call someone a moron? When he isn't capable of rational thinking. We can all agree that when being rational, the likeliness of the Bible and the Qu'ran being right and really being written by God is very low. So if you choose to disregard this logic, you're a moron.
 

Tom

The DJ
Oct 30, 2001
11,726
For what its worth I think you should never have been banned. All you said was that you believe all religions to be absolute rubbish (albeit in stronger terms) then took the piss a bit. Religion is a choice, a way of life. People call me a sad bastard for being an accountant - do I care? No. This is exactly the same, a bit of well humoured piss taking. Utterly ridiculous decision.

Sad to say I am not a good judge of character. Power has certainly changed you Zlatan, which is a bit of a lame thing to say - this only being an internet forum but your superior attitude and lack of any sort of interpersonal skills aren't appropriate characteristics of a moderator.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,031
Even though I agree with the ban because he had it coming, Zlatan's demeanor on this forum has certainly changed since he has received the power. I sort of expected him to become a bit too full of himself with being a mod, and he unfortunately has..
 

Snoop

Sabet is a nasty virgin
Oct 2, 2001
28,186
Tom said:
For what its worth I think you should never have been banned. All you said was that you believe all religions to be absolute rubbish (albeit in stronger terms) then took the piss a bit. Religion is a choice, a way of life. People call me a sad bastard for being an accountant - do I care? No. This is exactly the same, a bit of well humoured piss taking. Utterly ridiculous decision.

Sad to say I am not a good judge of character. Power has certainly changed you Zlatan, which is a bit of a lame thing to say - this only being an internet forum but your superior attitude and lack of any sort of interpersonal skills aren't appropriate characteristics of a moderator.
Zlatan didn't ban Seven because of those quotes,you know that very well Tom,but he changed the topic to peronal insults and disrespect to the believers.
I think Zlatan has the right this time,he warned him before many times..
 
OP
ßöмßäяðîëя
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #212
    Tom said:
    Sad to say I am not a good judge of character. Power has certainly changed you Zlatan, which is a bit of a lame thing to say - this only being an internet forum but your superior attitude and lack of any sort of interpersonal skills aren't appropriate characteristics of a moderator.

    THANKYOU

    I tried to say this, but I got warned by him, and then thought i was going to get banned.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,031
    Exactly snoop. And nice to see Seven intentionally not quoting his insulting posts...the couple that actually led to his ban.

    snoop said:
    Zlatan didn't ban Seven because of those quotes,you know that very well Tom,but he changed the topic to peronal insults and disrespect to the believers.
    I think Zlatan has the right this time,he warned him before many times..
     

    Tom

    The DJ
    Oct 30, 2001
    11,726
    snoop personal insults are thr norm on these forums - I've had more than my fair share and nobody's ever been banned for them. If people want to believe in a set religion then fine but they shouldn't be exempt from criticism or piss taking imo because these forums are a medium for people to air their views, however right/left wing they may be.

    The only times when piss taking goes too far is when its against things that can't be helped - ie sexism racism ageism, taking the piss because of illness genetic defect or whatever - that is of course wrong and should be met with a ban.

    Religion is neither here nor there, it enjoys a ridiculous level of protection and importance, not only on here but in the real world as well. If people like tifoso lou are allowed to thrust their condescending self righteous and downright patronising opinions on non-believers then we are allowed to do the same
     
    Dec 19, 2005
    43
    WHAT FUCKING POST DID I GET BANNED FOR THEN? All the others are filled with arguments. If you're going to say those arguments were disrespectful, and I think that's what you're going to do, you're downright disgusting.
     
    Dec 19, 2005
    43
    Seven said:
    You know what.

    I just might be God.

    That's it, I've decided I'm God. Now obey me until you can prove I'm not God.

    Fuck yourself in the ass, axlrose, I demand it!
    Is this the insulting one? Where is it insulting? All I did was prove that I COULD BE god. For all I know, you haven't exactly proved that I'm not, Rochel. As for the demand for assfucking: if axl didn't believe I was God, he obviously didn't have to do so. Or are you saying Axl HAD to fuck himself in the ass because he had to believe I was God? Now now, let's give the guy some credit.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)