Microsoft fined by EU (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Martin
- Start date
Try living here. For all that I support the EU, it's not democratic or accountable enough for me. The direction Europe has gone and is going is not determined by a groundswell of public opinion, and I for one don't like our leaders deciding that election is a mandate to do whatever the heck they want.mikhail you think the US is democratic? I suggest you read up on the patriot act 
in fact while your at that look at the 'censored' link in my signature.
ive come to the conclusio that the place where i will be happiest is on a remote island or a desert. but thats just me
besides that, what made you come to that conclusion about the EU?
in fact while your at that look at the 'censored' link in my signature.
ive come to the conclusio that the place where i will be happiest is on a remote island or a desert. but thats just me
besides that, what made you come to that conclusion about the EU?
++ [ originally posted by Josh ] ++
mikhail you think the US is democratic? I suggest you read up on the patriot act
mikhail you think the US is democratic? I suggest you read up on the patriot act
Already done do. Depressing stuff.
ive come to the conclusio that the place where i will be happiest is on a remote island or a desert. but thats just me
We had a whole Commission resign over corruption. :fero:
When Ireland voted no on the Nice Treaty, they actually had the bloody audacity to make us vote on it again.
Can you believe that? "Ah, no. The election didn't go as planned. You'll have to vote again. Vote Republican, that is."Here's an article on the resignation
It's practically impossible to get a genuinely knowledgable debate on it.
The Nice Treaty has its own website. Of course, it's nicely sanitised, so we'd vote for it without thinking.
Here's a site with more or less the opposite agenda.
A quote from the second site: "The Nice treaty is a difficult document to read and understand in part because it is a list of amendments to already existing documents including the European Union treaty itself. In order to try to understand these you end up flicking back and forth between growing mountains of paper."
It's practically impossible to get a genuinely knowledgable debate on it.
The Nice Treaty has its own website. Of course, it's nicely sanitised, so we'd vote for it without thinking.
Here's a site with more or less the opposite agenda.
A quote from the second site: "The Nice treaty is a difficult document to read and understand in part because it is a list of amendments to already existing documents including the European Union treaty itself. In order to try to understand these you end up flicking back and forth between growing mountains of paper."
Worries about the railroading of this treaty over the rest of Europe (I think we're the only country that actually voted on it - the rest of them just ran it through their parlements); worries about the militarisation of the EU, and how it could overwrite our neutrality; worries about loss of soverignty. :down:
Then you have the scaremongering from stupid people who have an irational fear of Europe without the intelligence or workrate to actually find out why. Things like loss of jobs to the east with expansion, loss of financial aid to the new member states, globalisation (like that has anything to do with Nice specifically
), rampant immigration, loss of power and influence. :fero:
Then you have the scaremongering from stupid people who have an irational fear of Europe without the intelligence or workrate to actually find out why. Things like loss of jobs to the east with expansion, loss of financial aid to the new member states, globalisation (like that has anything to do with Nice specifically
), rampant immigration, loss of power and influence. :fero:
:LOL:
++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++
Worries about the railroading of this treaty over the rest of Europe (I think we're the only country that actually voted on it - the rest of them just ran it through their parlements); worries about the militarisation of the EU, and how it could overwrite our neutrality; worries about loss of soverignty. :down:
Then you have the scaremongering from stupid people who have an irational fear of Europe without the intelligence or workrate to actually find out why. Things like loss of jobs to the east with expansion, loss of financial aid to the new member states, globalisation (like that has anything to do with Nice specifically ), rampant immigration, loss of power and influence. :fero:
Worries about the railroading of this treaty over the rest of Europe (I think we're the only country that actually voted on it - the rest of them just ran it through their parlements); worries about the militarisation of the EU, and how it could overwrite our neutrality; worries about loss of soverignty. :down:
Then you have the scaremongering from stupid people who have an irational fear of Europe without the intelligence or workrate to actually find out why. Things like loss of jobs to the east with expansion, loss of financial aid to the new member states, globalisation (like that has anything to do with Nice specifically
), rampant immigration, loss of power and influence. :fero:
The whole concept of the European Union arrived here from hell imo. HELL I tell you!
They should re-name it. Call it Franco-German Empire :groan:
++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++
Then you have the scaremongering from stupid people who have an irational fear of Europe without the intelligence or workrate to actually find out why. Things like loss of jobs to the east with expansion, loss of financial aid to the new member states, globalisation (like that has anything to do with Nice specifically ), rampant immigration, loss of power and influence. :fero:
Then you have the scaremongering from stupid people who have an irational fear of Europe without the intelligence or workrate to actually find out why. Things like loss of jobs to the east with expansion, loss of financial aid to the new member states, globalisation (like that has anything to do with Nice specifically
), rampant immigration, loss of power and influence. :fero:
Well that's very reassuring
Great Britain over France? Germany at the same level? :undecide:
Here's how I would do it, based on the armies of these countries (both in number and in technological advancement) and their influence in the world.
1. USA
20. Great Britain and France
21. Russia and China
22. Germany
Germany's army is crap and has been crap ever since they lost WWII. Solid reputation but nothing but scrapheap rubble.
But I suppose multiple options are possible. Perhaps mine is a tad too European...
Great Britain over France? Germany at the same level? :undecide:
Here's how I would do it, based on the armies of these countries (both in number and in technological advancement) and their influence in the world.
1. USA
20. Great Britain and France
21. Russia and China
22. Germany
Germany's army is crap and has been crap ever since they lost WWII. Solid reputation but nothing but scrapheap rubble.
But I suppose multiple options are possible. Perhaps mine is a tad too European...
