Hey, you’re defining a black and white scudetto win/loss decides whether his appointment is good or not.
Lots of teams have won CL while losing league. If Pirlo manages to pull that off, his first year is a stunning success regardless of the league.
Lol of course it's a success if he wins the CL, however it's an unlikely scenario, do you want me to list all of them?
- - - Updated - - -
Do we really have the best squad though? Inter is pretty darn good, too. Ronaldo and MDL are two players.
Inter is full of jabronis that are well below our level jabronis, however it's the coach that either makes them into useful parts or not.
Would you say that Pep, Klopp, Zidane should have been fired from City, Liverpool and Real because they didn’t win the league in their first seasons?
Not saying that Pirlo is as good as any of those guys, just curious to know if a coach has to be fired if he doesn’t win the league. I guess Lippi and Trappatoni should’ve been sacked because they didn’t win the scudetto in 85 and 96.
Fired is a whole different argument, it's not the same as the "was he a bad appointment?" argument, you keep switching to that.

Pep should've been fired, yes, he's spent a fortune and delivered what, one-two league titles and multiple disappointing CL exits in his four (?) years there, if they replaced him with Allegri or Zidane when they were free, chances are they'd be better off title-wise.
Zidane is not a case of not winning right away, he pretty much did. Klopp inherited a del Neri level team, no one expected them to win right away. A lot of factors involved in winning/losing the league to an inferior team, but it's a lot easier to take the leap of faith with a proven coach, imagine Xavi in place of Pep at City - that guy would never get a lifeline as long and rightfully so.