Yeah, but it's exactly the same with Napoli, you could attribute the pricetags of Higuain, Insigne or Koulibaly to Sarri just as easily as with Kane, Delle Alli or Son with Poch, without Sarri breaking the Napoli points records for 3 seasons in a row we probably don't see them as clear cut second team in Serie A ahead of Inter, Roma or whatever.
And I don't mind rating Poch over Sarri, that's reasonable as everyone sees footie a bit different, I might even agree with that as Poch is much more experienced at the top level. But I have a problem with the inconsistency in how they're treated on tuz. Most of the footie related criticism about beautiful football, overachieving, but cracking at the last step, not being able to win even the small trophies etc apply to both, but because of Sarri's history and general appearance, one is deemed a dream choice while the other a catastrophe.
Where's the "winning is the only thing that matters" attitude, if we allow tracksuits, napoli history or bad public image dictate who is a good coach and who is not?