serious question: have you seen empoli and chelsea under sarri? both teams played boring, possession-based, pragmatic football. sarriball = beautiful

attacking

football

is a myth busted long ago.
the sooner you embrace it, the less disappointed/deluded you'll be:
SARRI WOULDN'T GUARANTEE ATTACKING FOOTBALL.
the main point of the sarriboiz is completely invalid. and that is my hope regarding sarri: i hope he forgets that naive all-out attacking football that got him the worldwide recognition at napoli, a goal scoring record for the club, a 3rd place behind juve and roma, and some moderate success in any cup competition they entered, with 6 goals conceded against real in the cl knockouts. i hope sarri will be rational and rely on our strengths rather than his own (or his naive supporters') ideas.
also, liverpool won the cl with the best defense of the tournament, thanks to one of the best goalkeeper and one of the best cb available. we lost in cardiff, because we defended much worse than real. zidane transformed real madrid into a winning machine by introducing casemiro instead of james rodriguez. ajax were out against tottenham because they didn't defend properly. we lost to bayern a couple of years ago with a blatant defensive error by evra. and i repeat: i hope sarri will focus on our strengths, which was teamwork and organization in the last 8 years.