...the same argument can be applied to Allegro's last two seasons then, before getting fired...
yeah, like winning is easy. inda's latest dinasty lasted for a year. milan's young and very talented, overachieving dinasty lasted for an other. there are always ups and downs. look at real, they had the perfect squad with zidane, they won 3 cl's and couldn't keep it up in the league. look at city, they have by far the best squad in their league for almost a decade now, and they are still losing league titles here and there. so what.
sarri never worked for juventus, that's the point. it was never gonna work, it was a bad idea from the get go. i wouldn't make ANY arguments like you that i should start with
'i'm not a sarriboy but'. stop defending maurice in any ways. also, stop comparing his tenure at juve to allegri's first stint, cause one of them put us back to the european map and won 4 domestic doubles, the other completely embarrased us in europe and dedicated our coppa loss to his southern buddies. levels.
also, like coaches worked in a vacuum. before allegri was fired he planned to reform the squad. he knew that that squad wasn't gonna be able to win for too long. you can argue that firing him was the right idea, but look at where we are now. fixing the squad is inevitable at this point, regardless of the coach - and it's been the case for years. the coach discussion should be secondary for the last 4-5 seasons, yet here we are.
I don't know why people keep bringing up Sarri and Pirlo. It's a very common tactic from Allegro supporters to deflect from his cancerous football.
maxi celebrated the lazio win yesterday in multiple threads and doubled down today, and zzak tried to deflect like you said. it works for everyone it seems