out now?


  • Total voters
    166
  • Poll closed .

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,829

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,829

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,352
I see.

Well, he was the least effective when receiving the ball to his feet with back to goal. Once he gets the ball settled he is fine it's just getting the ball controlled he can be shaky.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,352
I see.

Well, he was the least effective when receiving the ball to his feet with back to goal. Once he gets the ball settled he is fine it's just getting the ball controlled he can be shaky.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
61,271
I just don't see the difference between how he would play in a 4 3 1 2 as opposed to the 3 5 2. Didn't we play against Real like that? Yes but Tevez is a better treq than Marchisio.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
61,271
I just don't see the difference between how he would play in a 4 3 1 2 as opposed to the 3 5 2. Didn't we play against Real like that? Yes but Tevez is a better treq than Marchisio.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,474
I just don't see the difference between how he would play in a 4 3 1 2 as opposed to the 3 5 2. Didn't we play against Real like that? Yes but Tevez is a better treq than Marchisio.
Definitely, which is why we should not play Marchisio as TQ.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,474
I just don't see the difference between how he would play in a 4 3 1 2 as opposed to the 3 5 2. Didn't we play against Real like that? Yes but Tevez is a better treq than Marchisio.
Definitely, which is why we should not play Marchisio as TQ.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 142)