Mafia: Chaos in the Kingdom of Tuz (5 Viewers)

[Maddy]

You are deflecting off Soren, despite having no explenation to why he's suddenly posting less ?

Actually Søren did post a pretty plausible reason to why he is posting less. A reason that applies to me as well. It's called: "This ain't the summer holidays. We got to work. Can't post liek maniacs"

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Fred]

I don't think we should go for either Kyle or Soren because of their inactivity for now. Osman, ALC, Salvo, joker and you are my prime candidates for today.

They're inactive here perhaps, but you can bet your house that they're active where it matters, in pm's.

 

[Hængebøffer]

I have been posting a lot and Fred starts babling about me being quiet, but first he's trying to make me look like one always analyzing the shit out of people
I already said that I won't be posting much today, because I'm working and going out.
I'm voting Fred because of what I just wrote and because he just got people's attention directed towards me and I won't be here to defend myself.

 

[IliveForJuve]

What if Ragazza made the 3 Danes G's?

 

[Klin]

You are deflecting off Soren, despite having no explenation to why he's suddenly posting less ?

I'm not deflecting. At this point of the game, lynching an active player gives us more answers.

 

[Fred]

Actually Søren did post a pretty plausible reason to why he is posting less. A reason that applies to me as well. It's called: "This ain't the summer holidays. We got to work. Can't post liek maniacs"

I work too, and i commute one hour to and from work, but there are a few hours in the day where i can post. come on, its not like he didn't know he had a job when he signed up.

 

[Völler]

I'm honestly having a really hard time figuring out who to vote for.

It's probably between Enron, PostIronic, j0ker and Søren for me. The worst thing, though, is that killing either of those won't give us a lot of answers. j0ker would probably give the most answers of those, but lynching him could also give us nothing. Osman or maybe Fred could give some answers, but I don't really have a reason to suspect them - at least Osman.

I'm going with j0ker, but it's really because of a lack of better options.

 

[Klin]

You could have be trying to save Fred too.

After all this was the vote count 15 minutes before deadline:

 

[Völler]

I'm gonna be offline for a few hours.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Whats the point of going after inactive players instead of others who we at least have hunches on. A hunch based on their activity is better than a 1/3 gamble

 

[Maddy]

I work too, and i commute one hour to and from work, but there are a few hours in the day where i can post. come on, its not like he didn't know he had a job when he signed up.

This makes no sense Fred. I was merely pointing out why Søren is less active beacuse it applies to myself. Not whether or not he knew he had to work when he signed up.

 

[Fred]

I have been posting a lot and Fred starts babling about me being quiet, but first he's trying to make me look like one always analyzing the shit out of people
I already said that I won't be posting much today, because I'm working and going out.
I'm voting Fred because of what I just wrote and because he just got people's attention directed towards me and I won't be here to defend myself.

Voting for me because i brought attention to you? thats not like you soren, lazy logic really. Just goes to reinforce my opinion that you are a G.

I'm not deflecting. At this point of the game, lynching an active player gives us more answers.

Not necessarily, in most games lynching active players means lynching a C. Thats why I think you, Voller and Ocelot are C's, you are way too active, visible and involved to be a G.

 

[Hængebøffer]

I find Klin exceptionally offensive, and soren exceptionally abscent.

You just make up your own facts?

 

[IliveForJuve]

People with 32 posts must be G's

 

[j0ker]

I'm honestly having a really hard time figuring out who to vote for.

It's probably between Enron, PostIronic, j0ker and Søren for me. The worst thing, though, is that killing either of those won't give us a lot of answers. j0ker would probably give the most answers of those, but lynching him could also give us nothing. Osman or maybe Fred could give some answers, but I don't really have a reason to suspect them - at least Osman.

I'm going with j0ker, but it's really because of a lack of better options.

You got me.

 

[Hængebøffer]

I work too, and i commute one hour to and from work, but there are a few hours in the day where i can post. come on, its not like he didn't know he had a job when he signed up.

I already told you guys I'm going out for dinner and movie. I'll post you the tickets, when I pick them up.

 

[Zacheryah]

Whats the point of going after inactive players instead of others who we at least have hunches on. A hunch based on their activity is better than a 1/3 gamble

Cool, all a G got to do is lean back and slip under the radar.

As in, i got accusations all day yesterday, cause 'i wasent posting so i had to be a G"

 

[Hængebøffer]

This makes no sense Fred. I was merely pointing out why Søren is less active beacuse it applies to myself. Not whether or not he knew he had to work when he signed up.

He posted less than me

 

[Völler]

piotrr seemed to be acting and voting more strange than usual yesterday. Maybe him getting autolynched will turn out to be a blessing in disguise.

 

[Klin]

Not necessarily, in most games lynching active players means lynching a C. Thats why I think you, Voller and Ocelot are C's, you are way too active, visible and involved to be a G.

That's obviously also what a G would say before he plans to whack an active C.